arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2005.00284cs.HC
收藏

房间里的陌生人:解读“智能”的感知和家庭中的相关伦理问题

Strangers in the Room: Unpacking Perceptions of 'Smartness' and Related Ethical Concerns in the Home

William Seymour, Reuben Binns, Petr Slovak, Max Van Kleek, Nigel Shadbolt

摘要:

“智能”设备的日益广泛使用引发了关于其在家庭空间中使用的各种道德问题。以前的工作检查这样的道德层面通常涉及的问题所提出的具体设备和使用环境的实证研究,或者阐述了抽象的概念,如自主权,隐私或信任一般与“灵巧家庭”。本文试图通过询问智能设备用户认为它们“智能”的功能以及这些功能与道德问题的关系来弥合这些方法。通过多方法调查,包括智能设备用户(n=120)和半结构化访谈(n=15)的调查,我们确定并描述了八种类型的智能,并探讨他们如何产生各种道德问题,包括隐私,自主权,和社会秩序的破坏。我们认为,这种中间地带,从特定设备和更抽象的道德概念所产生的关注之间,可以更好地预测潜在的智能设备的道德问题。

英文摘要:

The increasingly widespread use of 'smart' devices has raised multifarious ethical concerns regarding their use in domestic spaces. Previous work examining such ethical dimensions has typically either involved empirical studies of concerns raised by specific devices and use contexts, or alternatively expounded on abstract concepts like autonomy, privacy or trust in relation to 'smart homes' in general. This paper attempts to bridge these approaches by asking what features of smart devices users consider as rendering them 'smart' and how these relate to ethical concerns. Through a multimethod investigation including surveys with smart device users (n=120) and semi-structured interviews (n=15), we identify and describe eight types of smartness and explore how they engender a variety of ethical concerns including privacy, autonomy, and disruption of the social order. We argue that this middle ground, between concerns arising from particular devices and more abstract ethical concepts, can better anticipate potential ethical concerns regarding smart devices.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑