arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.14096cs.CLcs.LG
收藏

Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?

Uppsala University(乌普萨拉大学);University of Oslo(奥斯陆大学);University of Copenhagen(哥本哈根大学)

Artur Kulmizev, Vinit Ravishankar, Mostafa Abdou, Joakim Nivre

英文摘要:

Recent work on the interpretability of deep neural language models has concluded that many properties of natural language syntax are encoded in their representational spaces. However, such studies often suffer from limited scope by focusing on a single language and a single linguistic formalism. In this study, we aim to investigate the extent to which the semblance of syntactic structure captured by language models adheres to a surface-syntactic or deep syntactic style of analysis, and whether the patterns are consistent across different languages. We apply a probe for extracting directed dependency trees to BERT and ELMo models trained on 13 different languages, probing for two different syntactic annotation styles: Universal Dependencies (UD), prioritizing deep syntactic relations, and Surface-Syntactic Universal Dependencies (SUD), focusing on surface structure. We find that both models exhibit a preference for UD over SUD - with interesting variations across languages and layers - and that the strength of this preference is correlated with differences in tree shape.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑