arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.13459stat.MEecon.EMstat.AP
收藏

连续处理干扰下的网络因果推断

Causal Inference on Networks under Continuous Treatment Interference

Laura Forastiere, Davide Del Prete, Valerio Leone Sciabolazza

AI总结:

针对连续处理与网络干扰下的非实验政策评估场景,提出基于广义倾向得分的估计量,可估计直接和溢出效应并适配异质强度的非对称网络,农业市场应用显示忽略干扰会低估政策有效性。

摘要:

本文研究干扰情形,即一个单元的处理也会影响其他单元的结果。当存在干扰时,政策评估大多依赖于集群干扰和二元处理下的随机实验。相反,我们考虑了连续处理和网络干扰下的非实验场景。具体而言,我们将网络处理暴露度定义为通过物理、社会或经济互动连接的单元所接受处理的加权平均,以此定义溢出效应。我们提出了一种基于广义倾向得分的估计量,用于估计连续处理的直接效应和溢出效应。我们的估计量还允许考虑以异质强度为特征的非对称网络连接。为了展示该方法,我们研究了溢出效应是否以及如何影响农业市场政策干预的最优水平。我们的结果表明,在该场景下,忽略干扰可能会低估政策的有效程度。

英文摘要:

This paper investigates the case of interference, when a unit's treatment also affects other units' outcome. When interference is at work, policy evaluation mostly relies on the use of randomized experiments under cluster interference and binary treatment. Instead, we consider a non-experimental setting under continuous treatment and network interference. In particular, we define spillover effects by specifying the exposure to network treatment as a weighted average of the treatment received by units connected through physical, social or economic interactions. We provide a generalized propensity score-based estimator to estimate both direct and spillover effects of a continuous treatment. Our estimator also allows to consider asymmetric network connections characterized by heterogeneous intensities. To showcase this methodology, we investigate whether and how spillover effects shape the optimal level of policy interventions in agricultural markets. Our results show that, in this context, neglecting interference may underestimate the degree of policy effectiveness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑