arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.13455cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.SI
收藏

DTCA:基于决策树的协同注意力网络可解释索赔验证

DTCA: Decision Tree-based Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Claim Verification

Xi’an Jiaotong University(西安交通大学);Research Institute of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shenzhen(深圳西安交通大学研究院)

Lianwei Wu, Yuan Rao, Yongqiang Zhao, Hao Liang, Ambreen Nazir

摘要:

近年来,许多方法通过合适的神经网络从可靠的信息源中发现有效的证据,用于可解释索赔的验证,得到了广泛的认可。然而,在这些方法中,证据的发现过程是不透明的和不可解释的。同时,发现的证据只是粗略地针对整个索赔序列的可解释性,而不足以集中于索赔的虚假部分。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于决策树的协同注意模型(DTCA)发现证据的可解释索赔验证。具体来说,我们首先构造基于决策树的证据模型(DTE),以透明和可解释的方式选择可信度高的评论作为证据。然后设计了共注意自注意网络(CaSa),使所选证据与索赔相互作用,目的是:1)训练DTE确定最优决策阈值,获得更有力的证据; 2)利用证据发现索赔中的虚假部分。在两个公开数据集RumourEval和PHEME上的实验表明,DTCA不仅为索赔验证结果提供了解释,而且还实现了最先进的性能,分别将F1分数提高了3.11%和2.41%。

英文摘要:

Recently, many methods discover effective evidence from reliable sources by appropriate neural networks for explainable claim verification, which has been widely recognized. However, in these methods, the discovery process of evidence is nontransparent and unexplained. Simultaneously, the discovered evidence only roughly aims at the interpretability of the whole sequence of claims but insufficient to focus on the false parts of claims. In this paper, we propose a Decision Tree-based Co-Attention model (DTCA) to discover evidence for explainable claim verification. Specifically, we first construct Decision Tree-based Evidence model (DTE) to select comments with high credibility as evidence in a transparent and interpretable way. Then we design Co-attention Self-attention networks (CaSa) to make the selected evidence interact with claims, which is for 1) training DTE to determine the optimal decision thresholds and obtain more powerful evidence; and 2) utilizing the evidence to find the false parts in the claim. Experiments on two public datasets, RumourEval and PHEME, demonstrate that DTCA not only provides explanations for the results of claim verification but also achieves the state-of-the-art performance, boosting the F1-score by 3.11%, 2.41%, respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑