arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.11627cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML

Convolution-Weight-Distribution Assumption: Rethinking the Criteria of Channel Pruning

SenseTime Research(商汤科技研究院);The University of Hong Kong(香港大学);Sun Yat-Sen University(中山大学);The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学)

Zhongzhan Huang, Wenqi Shao, Xinjiang Wang, Liang Lin, Ping Luo

英文摘要:

Channel pruning is a popular technique for compressing convolutional neural networks (CNNs), where various pruning criteria have been proposed to remove the redundant filters. From our comprehensive experiments, we found two blind spots in the study of pruning criteria: (1) Similarity: There are some strong similarities among several primary pruning criteria that are widely cited and compared. According to these criteria, the ranks of filters'Importance Score are almost identical, resulting in similar pruned structures. (2) Applicability: The filters'Importance Score measured by some pruning criteria are too close to distinguish the network redundancy well. In this paper, we analyze these two blind spots on different types of pruning criteria with layer-wise pruning or global pruning. The analyses are based on the empirical experiments and our assumption (Convolutional Weight Distribution Assumption) that the well-trained convolutional filters each layer approximately follow a Gaussian-alike distribution. This assumption has been verified through systematic and extensive statistical tests.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑