arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.10356cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

Quantifying With Only Positive Training Data

Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação, Universidade de São Paulo(圣保罗大学数学与计算机科学学院);Université d’Orléans(奥尔良大学);UNSW Sydney(新南威尔士大学悉尼分校)

Denis dos Reis, Marcílio de Souto, Elaine de Sousa, Gustavo Batista

英文摘要:

Quantification is the research field that studies methods for counting the number of data points that belong to each class in an unlabeled sample. Traditionally, researchers in this field assume the availability of labelled observations for all classes to induce a quantification model. However, we often face situations where the number of classes is large or even unknown, or we have reliable data for a single class. When inducing a multi-class quantifier is infeasible, we are often concerned with estimates for a specific class of interest. In this context, we have proposed a novel setting known as One-class Quantification (OCQ). In contrast, Positive and Unlabeled Learning (PUL), another branch of Machine Learning, has offered solutions to OCQ, despite quantification not being the focal point of PUL. This article closes the gap between PUL and OCQ and brings both areas together under a unified view. We compare our method, Passive Aggressive Threshold (PAT), against PUL methods and show that PAT generally is the fastest and most accurate algorithm. PAT induces quantification models that can be reused to quantify different samples of data. We additionally introduce Exhaustive TIcE (ExTIcE), an improved version of the PUL algorithm Tree Induction for c Estimation (TIcE). We show that ExTIcE quantifies more accurately than PAT and the other assessed algorithms in scenarios where several negative observations are identical to the positive ones.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑