arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.10190cs.LGcs.CVcs.ROstat.ML
收藏

Never Stop Learning: The Effectiveness of Fine-Tuning in Robotic Reinforcement Learning

Google Research, Robotics at Google Team(谷歌研究院,谷歌机器人团队);University of Southern California(南加州大学);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Ryan Julian, Benjamin Swanson, Gaurav S. Sukhatme, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, Karol Hausman

英文摘要:

One of the great promises of robot learning systems is that they will be able to learn from their mistakes and continuously adapt to ever-changing environments. Despite this potential, most of the robot learning systems today are deployed as a fixed policy and they are not being adapted after their deployment. Can we efficiently adapt previously learned behaviors to new environments, objects and percepts in the real world? In this paper, we present a method and empirical evidence towards a robot learning framework that facilitates continuous adaption. In particular, we demonstrate how to adapt vision-based robotic manipulation policies to new variations by fine-tuning via off-policy reinforcement learning, including changes in background, object shape and appearance, lighting conditions, and robot morphology. Further, this adaptation uses less than 0.2% of the data necessary to learn the task from scratch. We find that our approach of adapting pre-trained policies leads to substantial performance gains over the course of fine-tuning, and that pre-training via RL is essential: training from scratch or adapting from supervised ImageNet features are both unsuccessful with such small amounts of data. We also find that these positive results hold in a limited continual learning setting, in which we repeatedly fine-tune a single lineage of policies using data from a succession of new tasks. Our empirical conclusions are consistently supported by experiments on simulated manipulation tasks, and by 52 unique fine-tuning experiments on a real robotic grasping system pre-trained on 580,000 grasps.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑