arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.06191stat.ME

复杂调查中单向方差分析模型的伪贝叶斯估计

Pseudo Bayesian Estimation of One-way ANOVA Model in Complex Surveys

Terrance D. Savitsky, Matthew R. Williams, Sanvesh Srivastava

AI总结:

针对复杂调查中的单向方差分析模型,提出两种调查加权伪后验估计方法,在满足关键条件下实现渐近无偏估计,并与频率学派方法对比。

摘要:

我们针对一个单向方差分析(ANOVA)总体生成模型,设计了一种在初级群和次级嵌套单元均进行两阶段信息性抽样的调查加权伪后验分布估计器。该模型作为一个简单的典型情形,其中总体模型随机效应被定义为与初级群重合,例如基于2000年经济合作与发展组织国际学生评估项目(PISA)的学校和学生的调查来评估学生表现。我们考虑在观测到的信息性样本上,分别使用增强伪似然(该似然同时抽样随机效应)和积分似然(该似然从调查加权增强伪似然中对随机效应进行边缘化)进行估计。本文包含理论阐述,列举了易于验证的条件,在这些条件下,增强伪后验下的估计保证在真实生成参数处具有一致性。我们在模拟中揭示,当关于群内加权残差总和的一个关键条件得到满足时,两种方法都能对随机效应的生成超参数产生渐近无偏估计。我们与两种频率学派替代方法进行了比较,一种是期望最大化方法,另一种是需要成对抽样权重的复合似然方法。

英文摘要:

We devise survey-weighted pseudo posterior distribution estimators under two-stage informative sampling of both primary clusters and secondary nested units for a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) population generating model as a simple canonical case where population model random effects are defined to be coincident with the primary clusters, for example student performance based on a survey of schools and students such as the 2000 OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). We consider estimation on an observed informative sample under both an augmented pseudo likelihood that co-samples the random effects, as well as an integrated likelihood that marginalizes out the random effects from the survey-weighted augmented pseudo likelihood. This paper includes a theoretical exposition that enumerates easily verified conditions for which estimation under the augmented pseudo posterior is guaranteed to be consistent at the true generating parameters. We reveal in simulation that both approaches produce asymptotically unbiased estimation of the generating hyperparameters for the random effects when a key condition on the sum of within cluster weighted residuals is met. We present a comparison with two frequentist alternatives, an expectation-maximization approach and a composite likelihood method that requires pairwise sampling weights.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑