我们从四十年的语义干扰研究中学到了什么？贝叶斯荟萃分析
What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian metaanalysis
摘要：
当实验中的参与者必须命名图片，同时忽略叠加在图片上或错误地呈现的干扰词（即，图片-单词干扰范例），当要命名的单词（或目标）和干扰词来自相同的语义类别（例如，猫狗）。这种实验效应被称为语义干扰效应，可能是语言产生文献中研究最多的效应之一。然而，这种效应的功能起源和发生的确切条件仍有争议。自从Lupker在大约40年前的第一个反应时间实验中报告了这种效应以来，已经进行了300多个类似的实验。语义干扰效应在许多实验中得到了复制，但也有几项研究报告说，在实验条件的子集中没有效果。本研究的目的是提供一个全面的理论审查现有的证据，迄今为止，和几个贝叶斯元分析和元回归，以确定的影响的大小，并探讨实验条件下，效果的表面。结果进行了讨论，根据目前的争论语义干扰效应的功能起源及其对我们理解的语言生产系统的影响。
英文摘要：
When participants in an experiment have to name pictures while ignoring distractor words superimposed on the picture or presented auditorily (i.e., picture-word interference paradigm), they take more time when the word to be named (or target) and distractor words are from the same semantic category (e.g., cat-dog). This experimental effect is known as the semantic interference effect, and is probably one of the most studied in the language production literature. The functional origin of the effect and the exact conditions in which it occurs are however still debated. Since Lupker reported the effect in the first response time experiment about 40 years ago, more than 300 similar experiments have been conducted. The semantic interference effect was replicated in many experiments, but several studies also reported the absence of an effect in a subset of experimental conditions. The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive theoretical review of the existing evidence to date and several Bayesian meta-analyses and meta-regressions to determine the size of the effect and explore the experimental conditions in which the effect surfaces. The results are discussed in the light of current debates about the functional origin of the semantic interference effect and its implications for our understanding of the language production system.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
