arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.05113cs.CYcs.LGstat.ML
收藏

Automatically Assessing Quality of Online Health Articles

Charles Sturt University(查尔斯特大学);University of Maryland(马里兰大学)

Fariha Afsana, Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Naeemul Hassan, Manoranjan Paul

英文摘要:

The information ecosystem today is overwhelmed by an unprecedented quantity of data on versatile topics are with varied quality. However, the quality of information disseminated in the field of medicine has been questioned as the negative health consequences of health misinformation can be life-threatening. There is currently no generic automated tool for evaluating the quality of online health information spanned over a broad range. To address this gap, in this paper, we applied a data mining approach to automatically assess the quality of online health articles based on 10 quality criteria. We have prepared a labeled dataset with 53012 features and applied different feature selection methods to identify the best feature subset with which our trained classifier achieved an accuracy of 84%-90% varied over 10 criteria. Our semantic analysis of features shows the underpinning associations between the selected features & assessment criteria and further rationalize our assessment approach. Our findings will help in identifying high-quality health articles and thus aiding users in shaping their opinion to make the right choice while picking health-related help from online.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑