arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.03422cs.CL
收藏

从法律上处理仇恨言论:实施NLP禁止仇恨言论的法律框架,作为NLP的一项任务

A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU's Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Task

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods(马克斯·普朗克集体物品研究所);Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University(早稻田大学高等研究所);University of Duisburg-Essen(杜伊斯堡-埃森大学)

Frederike Zufall, Marius Hamacher, Katharina Kloppenborg, Torsten Zesch

摘要:

我们提出了一种“法律方法”,以仇恨言论检测的决定,是否一个职位是受刑法到一个NLP任务的操作。比较现有的仇恨言论监管制度,我们的调查基于欧洲联盟的框架,因为它提供了一个广泛适用的法律最低标准。准确判断一个职位是否应该受到惩罚通常需要法律培训。我们表明,通过将法律评估分解为一系列更简单的子决策,即使是外行也可以始终如一地进行注释。基于一个新注释的数据集,我们的实验表明,直接学习惩罚内容的自动化模型是具有挑战性的。然而,了解"目标群体"和"目标行为"这两个次级任务,而不是对惩罚采取端到端的办法,会产生更好的结果。总的来说,我们的方法还提供了比端到端模型更透明的决策,这是法律决策的关键点。

英文摘要:

We propose a 'legal approach' to hate speech detection by operationalization of the decision as to whether a post is subject to criminal law into an NLP task. Comparing existing regulatory regimes for hate speech, we base our investigation on the European Union's framework as it provides a widely applicable legal minimum standard. Accurately judging whether a post is punishable or not usually requires legal training. We show that, by breaking the legal assessment down into a series of simpler sub-decisions, even laypersons can annotate consistently. Based on a newly annotated dataset, our experiments show that directly learning an automated model of punishable content is challenging. However, learning the two sub-tasks of `target group' and `targeting conduct' instead of an end-to-end approach to punishability yields better results. Overall, our method also provides decisions that are more transparent than those of end-to-end models, which is a crucial point in legal decision-making.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑