F. E. Wietfeldt, R. Biswas, R. W. Haun, M. S. Dewey, J. Caylor, N. Fomin, G. L. Greene, C. C. Haddock, S. F. Hoogerheide, H. P. Mumm, J. S. Nico, B. Crawford, W. M. Snow
We comment on a recent manuscript by A. P. Serebrov, et al. regarding residual gas charge exchange in the beam neutron lifetime experiment
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
We discuss issues raised by Serebrov, et al. in a recent paper regarding systematic effects in the beam neutron lifetime experiment performed at NIST. We show that these effects were considered in the original analyses and that our corrections and systematic uncertainties were appropriate. We point out some misconceptions and erroneous assumptions in the analysis of Serebrov, et al. None of the issues raised in Serebrov, et al lead us to alter the value of the neutron lifetime reported previously.
It is shown, that criticism, presented in [arXiv:0912.4963], is based on an elementary error in the calculation of the collision frequency of an atom in a gas with walls of a container and misunderstanding of the method used in [arXiv:0902.1682v2] for obtaining constraints on new short-range spin-dependent interactions.
In work [1] (Yu. N. Pokotilovski, arXiv:0902.3425v2) restrictions on constants of pseudo-magnetic interaction gSgP are presented. These restrictions are considerably differed from restrictions on gSgP, before published in work [2] (A.P. Serebrov, arXiv:0902.1056v1). Restrictions in work [1] are received from the same experimental data which are used in work [2], however difference in restrictions is considerable. This difference is changed in a range from 1 to 10^7 times depending on value lambda. In the given work it is shown that restrictions of work [1] are wrong and the possible reasons of…
We are discussing the present situation with neutron lifetime measurements. There is a serious discrepancy between the previous experiments and the recent precise experiment [1]. The possible reason of the discrepancy can be connected with a quasi-elastic scattering of UCN on the surface of liquid fomblin which was used for most of the previous experiments. The Monte Carlo simulation of one of the previous experiments [2] shows that the result of this experiment [2] has to be corrected and instead of the previous result 887.6 +/- 3 s the new result 880.4 +/- 3 s has to be claimed. [1] A.P. Ser…
We performed a detailed analysis and the Monte Carlo simulation of the neutron lifetime experiment [S. Arzumanov et al., Phys. Lett. B 483 (2000) 15] because of the strong disagreement by 5.6 standard deviations between the results of this experiment and our experiment [A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005) 72]. We found a few effects which were not taken into account in the experiment [S. Arzumanov et al., Phys. Lett. B 483 (2000) 15]. The possible correction is -5.5 s with uncertainty of 2.4 s which comes from initial data knowledge. We assume that after taking into account this corre…
The author of article discusses the possible systematic effects in our experiment using reference and picture from allegedly our publication. First of all this publication does not exist. The assumption of author about the probability of lower energy upscattering is in a rough contradiction (300 times) with our experimental limit which is extremely lower, about 6x10-9 per neutron collision. The second assumption of author concerning quasi-stable orbits of UCN with higher energy due to specular neutron reflection from trap wall is also in a rough contradiction with our experimental data clear d…
In above mentioned article [1] assumptions of possible systematic errors of our experiment on measuring of the neutron lifetime [2] have been made. In the given comment we are obliged to explain, that assumptions made in [1] are erroneous. They are caused by an inattentive reading of our work [2] and by the improper understanding the methods used in our work [2]. Simulation of experiment [2] carried out in [1] seems to be imperfect and doesn't describe the experimental results. Therefore it is impossible to do any conclusions from such simulation.
We summarize our recent proposal of explaining the discrepancy between the bottle and beam measurements of the neutron lifetime through the existence of a dark sector, which the neutron can decay to with a branching fraction 1%. We show that viable particle physics models for such neutron dark decays can be constructed and we briefly comment on recent developments in this area.
Detection of molecular hydrogen in a neutron beam lifetime experiment
研究了分子氢与质子的电荷交换对中子寿命实验的影响，发现NIST的中子寿命结果未受显著影响。
扫码添加微信好友，提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写：网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取，如发现错误，欢迎反馈修正建议。