arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2003.13924cs.CVcs.LGcs.MAcs.RO
收藏

EvolveGraph:基于动态关系推理的多智能体轨迹预测

EvolveGraph: Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction with Dynamic Relational Reasoning

Honda Research Institute, USA(本田美国研究所);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Jiachen Li, Fan Yang, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Chiho Choi

摘要:

从纯物理系统到复杂的社会动态系统,多智能体交互系统在世界范围内普遍存在。在许多应用中,有效地理解情况和准确的轨迹预测的交互代理在下游任务,如决策和规划中发挥了重要作用。在本文中,我们提出了一个通用的轨迹预测框架(名为EvolveGraph)与显式的关系结构识别和预测,通过多个异构的,交互式代理之间的潜在的交互图。考虑到未来行为的不确定性,该模型被设计为提供多模态预测假设。由于潜在的相互作用可能会演变,即使突然的变化,不同的方式的演变可能会导致不同的结果,我们解决的必要性,动态关系推理和自适应发展的相互作用图。我们还引入了一个双阶段的训练管道,不仅提高了训练效率,加快了收敛速度,而且提高了模型的性能。所提出的框架在合成物理模拟和多个真实世界的基准数据集在各个领域进行了评估。实验结果表明,我们的方法在预测精度方面达到了最先进的性能。

英文摘要:

Multi-agent interacting systems are prevalent in the world, from pure physical systems to complicated social dynamic systems. In many applications, effective understanding of the situation and accurate trajectory prediction of interactive agents play a significant role in downstream tasks, such as decision making and planning. In this paper, we propose a generic trajectory forecasting framework (named EvolveGraph) with explicit relational structure recognition and prediction via latent interaction graphs among multiple heterogeneous, interactive agents. Considering the uncertainty of future behaviors, the model is designed to provide multi-modal prediction hypotheses. Since the underlying interactions may evolve even with abrupt changes, and different modalities of evolution may lead to different outcomes, we address the necessity of dynamic relational reasoning and adaptively evolving the interaction graphs. We also introduce a double-stage training pipeline which not only improves training efficiency and accelerates convergence, but also enhances model performance. The proposed framework is evaluated on both synthetic physics simulations and multiple real-world benchmark datasets in various areas. The experimental results illustrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of prediction accuracy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑