arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.10006cs.SE
收藏

软件工程中的快速评审

Rapid Reviews in Software Engineering

Bruno Cartaxo, Gustavo Pinto, Sergio Soares

摘要:

基于证据的软件工程(EBSE)的主要目标之一是将研究证据集成到实践中。次要研究是EBSE的主要产品之一,旨在总结最好的研究证据,并使其易于被从业者使用。然而,最近的研究表明,一些次级研究缺乏与软件工程实践的联系。在本章中,我们提出了快速审查的概念,这是轻量级的二次研究,重点是及时向从业者提供证据。快速审查有助于从业人员的决策,应结合实际问题进行,并纳入实际背景。因此,快速审查可以很容易地纳入知识/技术转让倡议。在描述了基本概念之后,我们介绍了进行两次快速审查的结果和经验。我们还提供了指导方针,以帮助研究人员和从业人员谁想要进行快速审查,我们最后讨论的主题,我关心的研究社区快速审查的可行性,作为一种基于证据的方法。总之,我们相信快速评审可能会引起从事软件工程研究与实践交叉工作的研究人员和实践者的兴趣。

英文摘要:

Integrating research evidence into practice is one of the main goals of Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE). Secondary studies, one of the main EBSE products, are intended to summarize the best research evidence and make them easily consumable by practitioners. However, recent studies show that some secondary studies lack connections with software engineering practice. In this chapter, we present the concept of Rapid Reviews, which are lightweight secondary studies focused on delivering evidence to practitioners in a timely manner. Rapid reviews support practitioners in their decision-making, and should be conducted bounded to a practical problem, inserted into a practical context. Thus, Rapid Reviews can be easily integrated in a knowledge/technology transfer initiative. After describing the basic concepts, we present the results and experiences of conducting two Rapid Reviews. We also provide guidelines to help researchers and practitioners who want to conduct Rapid Reviews, and we finally discuss topics that my concern the research community about the feasibility of Rapid Reviews as an Evidence-Based method. In conclusion, we believe Rapid Reviews might interest researchers and practitioners working in the intersection between software engineering research and practice.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑