arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.08087math.STstat.APstat.TH
收藏

线性混合模型估计量中由随机效应与对应模型矩阵的相关性引发的偏差诊断

A Diagnostic for Bias in Linear Mixed Model Estimators Induced by Dependence Between the Random Effects and the Corresponding Model Matrix

Andrew T. Karl, Dale L. Zimmerman

AI总结:

该研究分析了线性混合模型中随机效应与模型矩阵的相关性引发的估计量偏差,给出了偏差无偏的条件,量化了偏差并提出诊断方法,通过体育赛事结果验证了该方法的有效性。

摘要:

我们探究了线性混合模型中常被忽视的标准假设——随机效应模型矩阵是固定的(因此独立于随机效应向量)——被违背时,如何导致固定效应可估函数的估计量出现偏差。然而,若将原始混合模型的随机效应也视为固定效应,或固定效应与随机效应模型矩阵关于误差协方差矩阵的逆正交(概率为1),或随机效应与对应模型矩阵相互独立,则这些估计量是无偏的。我们量化了一般情况下的偏差,并将其随机效应贡献的诊断与预测随机效应的随机置换分布进行比较,为每个感兴趣的估计量生成了具有参考价值的汇总图。这一点通过对用于估计主场优势的体育赛事结果的检验得到了验证。

英文摘要:

We explore how violations of the often-overlooked standard assumption that the random effects model matrix in a linear mixed model is fixed (and thus independent of the random effects vector) can lead to bias in estimators of estimable functions of the fixed effects. However, if the random effects of the original mixed model are instead also treated as fixed effects, or if the fixed and random effects model matrices are orthogonal with respect to the inverse of the error covariance matrix (with probability one), or if the random effects and the corresponding model matrix are independent, then these estimators are unbiased. The bias in the general case is quantified, and a diagnostic for its random-effects contribution is compared to a randomized permutation distribution of the predicted random effects, producing an informative summary graphic for each estimator of interest. This is demonstrated through the examination of sporting outcomes used to estimate a home field advantage.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑