Marginal structural models fit via inverse probability of treatment weighting are commonly used to control for confounding when estimating causal effects from observational data. When planning a study that will be analyzed with marginal structural modeling, determining the required sample size for a given level of statistical power is challenging because of the effect of weighting on the variance of the estimated causal means. This paper considers the utility of the design effect to quantify the effect of weighting on the precision of causal estimates. The design effect is defined as the ratio of the variance of the causal mean estimator divided by the variance of a naive estimator if, counter to fact, no confounding had been present and weights were not needed. A simple, closed-form approximation of the design effect is derived that is outcome invariant and can be estimated during the study design phase. Once the design effect is approximated for each treatment group, sample size calculations are conducted as for a randomized trial, but with variances inflated by the design effects to account for weighting. Simulations demonstrate the accuracy of the design effect approximation, and practical considerations are discussed.
Marginal structural models are a popular tool for investigating the effects of time-varying treatments, but they require an assumption of no unobserved confounders between the treatment and outcome. With observational data, this assumption may be difficult to maintain, and in studies with panel data, many researchers use fixed effects models to purge the data of time-constant unmeasured confounding. Unfortunately, traditional linear fixed effects models are not suitable for estimating the effects of time-varying treatments, since they can only estimate lagged effects under implausible assumpti…
Robins 1997 introduced marginal structural models (MSMs), a general class of counterfactual models for the joint effects of time-varying treatment regimes in complex longitudinal studies subject to time-varying confounding. In his work, identification of MSM parameters is established under a sequential randomization assumption (SRA), which rules out unmeasured confounding of treatment assignment over time. We consider sufficient conditions for identification of the parameters of a subclass, Marginal Structural Mean Models (MSMMs), when sequential randomization fails to hold due to unmeasured c…
When making causal inferences, post-treatment confounders complicate analyses of time-varying treatment effects. Conditioning on these variables naively to estimate marginal effects may inappropriately block causal pathways and may induce spurious associations between treatment and the outcome, leading to bias. To avoid such bias, researchers often use marginal structural models (MSMs) with inverse probability weighting (IPW). However, IPW requires models for the conditional distributions of treatment and is highly sensitive to their misspecification. Moreover, IPW is relatively inefficient, s…
Marginal structural models (MSMs) with inverse probability weighting offer an approach to estimating causal effects of treatment sequences on repeated outcome measures in the presence of time-varying confounding and dependent censoring. However, when weights are estimated by maximum likelihood, inverse probability weighted estimators (IPWEs) can be inefficient and unstable in practice. We propose a joint calibration approach for inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights to improve the efficiency and robustness of the IPWEs for MSMs with time-varying treatments of arbitrary (i.e., …
Estimate Time-Varying Exposure Effects via Ensemble Learning-based Marginal Structural Model with Application to Adolescent Cognitive Development Study
Robins (1998) introduced marginal structural models (MSMs), a general class of counterfactual models for the joint effects of time-varying treatment regimes in complex longitudinal studies subject to time-varying confounding. He established identification of MSM parameters under a sequential randomization assumption (SRA), which essentially rules out unmeasured confounding of treatment assignment over time. In this technical report, we consider sufficient conditions for identification of MSM parameters with the aid of a time-varying instrumental variable, when sequential randomization fails to…
Marginal structural models were introduced in order to provide estimates of causal effects from interventions based on observational studies in epidemiological research. The key point is that this can be understood in terms of Girsanov's change of measure. This offers a mathematical interpretation of marginal structural models that has not been available before. We consider both a model of an observational study and a model of a hypothetical randomized trial. These models correspond to different martingale measures -- the observational measure and the randomized trial measure -- on some underl…
Longitudinal observational patient data can be used to investigate the causal effects of time-varying treatments on time-to-event outcomes. Several methods have been developed for controlling for the time-dependent confounding that typically occurs. The most commonly used is inverse probability weighted estimation of marginal structural models (MSM-IPTW). An alternative, the sequential trials approach, is increasingly popular, in particular in combination with the target trial emulation framework. This approach involves creating a sequence of `trials' from new time origins, restricting to indi…
Objectives: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) can inform decision-making concerning treatment initiation. Here, one requires predicted risks assuming that no treatment is given. This is challenging since CPMs are often derived in datasets where patients receive treatment; moreover, treatment can commence post-baseline - treatment drop-ins. This study presents a novel approach of using marginal structural models (MSMs) to adjust for treatment drop-in. Study Design and Setting: We illustrate the use of MSMs in the CPM framework through simulation studies, representing randomised controlled trial…
Observational longitudinal data on treatments and covariates are increasingly used to investigate treatment effects, but are often subject to time-dependent confounding. Marginal structural models (MSMs), estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting or the g-formula, are popular for handling this problem. With increasing development of advanced causal inference methods, it is important to be able to assess their performance in different scenarios to guide their application. Simulation studies are a key tool for this, but their use to evaluate causal inference methods has been lim…
Marginal structural models (MSMs) estimate the causal effect of a time-varying treatment in the presence of time-dependent confounding via weighted regression. The standard approach of using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) can lead to high-variance estimates due to extreme weights and be sensitive to model misspecification. Various methods have been proposed to partially address this, including truncation and stabilized-IPTW to temper extreme weights and covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) to address treatment model misspecification. In this paper, we present Kernel O…
Treatment-induced confounders complicate analyses of time-varying treatment effects and causal mediation. Conditioning on these variables naively to estimate marginal effects may inappropriately block causal pathways and may induce spurious associations between treatment and the outcome, leading to bias. Although several methods for estimating marginal effects avoid these complications, including inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted (IPTW) estimation of marginal structural models (MSMs) as well as g- and regression-with-residuals (RWR) estimation of highly constrained structural nested me…
A new class of Marginal Structural Models (MSMs), History-Restricted MSMs (HRMSMs), was recently introduced for longitudinal data for the purpose of defining causal parameters which may often be better suited for public health research or at least more practicable than MSMs \citejoffe,feldman. HRMSMs allow investigators to analyze the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome based on a fixed, shorter and user-specified history of exposure compared to MSMs. By default, the latter represent the treatment causal effect of interest based on a treatment history defined by the treatments assigned …
Two of the principle tasks of causal inference are to define and estimate the effect of a treatment on an outcome of interest. Formally, such treatment effects are defined as a possibly functional summary of the data generating distribution, and are referred to as target parameters. Estimation of the target parameter can be difficult, especially when it is high-dimensional. Marginal Structural Models (MSMs) provide a way to summarize such target parameters in terms of a lower dimensional working model. We introduce the semi-parametric efficiency bound for estimating MSM parameters in a general…
MSCT: Addressing Time-Varying Confounding with Marginal Structural Causal Transformer for Counterfactual Post-Crash Traffic Prediction
School of Transportation, Southeast University（东南大学交通学院）；Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London（帝国理工学院土木与环境工程系）；School of Mathematics, Southeast University（东南大学数学学院）；School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University（东南大学网络空间科学与工程学院）；Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington（华盛顿大学土木与环境工程系）
We consider the problem of inferring the total causal effect of a single variable intervention on a (response) variable of interest. We propose a certain marginal integration regression technique for a very general class of potentially nonlinear structural equation models (SEMs) with known structure, or at least known superset of adjustment variables: we call the procedure S-mint regression. We easily derive that it achieves the convergence rate as for nonparametric regression: for example, single variable intervention effects can be estimated with convergence rate $n^{-2/5}$ assuming smoothne…
Causal discovery estimates the underlying physical process that generates the observed data: does X cause Y or does Y cause X? Current methodologies use structural conditions to turn the causal query into a statistical query, when only observational data is available. But what if these statistical queries are sensitive to causal invariants? This study investigates one such invariant: the causal relationship between X and Y is invariant to the marginal distributions of X and Y. We propose an algorithm that uses a non-parametric estimator that is robust to changes in the marginal distributions. …
Due to unmeasured confounding, it is often not possible to identify causal effects from a postulated model. Nevertheless, we can ask for partial identification, which usually boils down to finding upper and lower bounds of a causal quantity of interest derived from all solutions compatible with the encoded structural assumptions. One appealing way to derive such bounds is by casting it in terms of a constrained optimization method that searches over all causal models compatible with evidence, as introduced in the classic work of Balke and Pearl (1994) for discrete data. Although by constructio…
Existing strategies for determining the optimal treatment or monitoring strategy typically assume unlimited access to resources. However, when a health system has resource constraints, such as limited funds, access to medication, or monitoring capabilities, medical decisions must balance impacts on both individual and population health outcomes. That is, decisions should account for competition between individuals in resource usage. One simple solution is to estimate the (counterfactual) resource usage under the possible interventions and choose the optimal strategy for which resource usage is…
Marginal structural models (MSMs) are commonly used to estimate causal intervention effects in longitudinal non-randomised studies. A common issue when analysing data from observational studies is the presence of incomplete confounder data, which might lead to bias in the intervention effect estimates if they are not handled properly in the statistical analysis. However, there is currently no recommendation on how to address missing data on covariates in MSMs under a variety of missingness mechanisms encountered in practice. We reviewed existing methods to handling missing data in MSMs and per…
Evolutionary Structural Shift in Security Screening Sensitivity within the U.S. Aviation Network: A 15-Year Longitudinal Bayesian Assessment (2010-2024)
