arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.02389cs.LGstat.ML

Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruning

MIT CSAIL(麻省理工学院计算机科学与人工智能实验室)

Alex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael Carbin

英文摘要:

Many neural network pruning algorithms proceed in three steps: train the network to completion, remove unwanted structure to compress the network, and retrain the remaining structure to recover lost accuracy. The standard retraining technique, fine-tuning, trains the unpruned weights from their final trained values using a small fixed learning rate. In this paper, we compare fine-tuning to alternative retraining techniques. Weight rewinding (as proposed by Frankle et al., (2019)), rewinds unpruned weights to their values from earlier in training and retrains them from there using the original training schedule. Learning rate rewinding (which we propose) trains the unpruned weights from their final values using the same learning rate schedule as weight rewinding. Both rewinding techniques outperform fine-tuning, forming the basis of a network-agnostic pruning algorithm that matches the accuracy and compression ratios of several more network-specific state-of-the-art techniques.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑