arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2002.11242cs.LGstat.ML

Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Stronger

National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学);Shandong University(山东大学);Hong Kong Baptist University(香港浸会大学);RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project(理化学研究所革新智能综合研究中心);The University of Tokyo(东京大学)

Jingfeng Zhang, Xilie Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu, Lizhen Cui, Masashi Sugiyama, Mohan Kankanhalli

英文摘要:

Adversarial training based on the minimax formulation is necessary for obtaining adversarial robustness of trained models. However, it is conservative or even pessimistic so that it sometimes hurts the natural generalization. In this paper, we raise a fundamental question---do we have to trade off natural generalization for adversarial robustness? We argue that adversarial training is to employ confident adversarial data for updating the current model. We propose a novel approach of friendly adversarial training (FAT): rather than employing most adversarial data maximizing the loss, we search for least adversarial (i.e., friendly adversarial) data minimizing the loss, among the adversarial data that are confidently misclassified. Our novel formulation is easy to implement by just stopping the most adversarial data searching algorithms such as PGD (projected gradient descent) early, which we call early-stopped PGD. Theoretically, FAT is justified by an upper bound of the adversarial risk. Empirically, early-stopped PGD allows us to answer the earlier question negatively---adversarial robustness can indeed be achieved without compromising the natural generalization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑