arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2002.10526math.STcs.LGstat.MLstat.TH

Asymptotic Analysis of Sampling Estimators for Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra Algorithms

The University of Georgia(佐治亚大学);University of California at San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校);Harvard University(哈佛大学);Central University of Finance and Economics(中央财经大学);International Computer Science Institute(国际计算机科学研究所);University of California at Berkeley(加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校)

Ping Ma, Xinlian Zhang, Xin Xing, Jingyi Ma, Michael W. Mahoney

英文摘要:

The statistical analysis of Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra (RandNLA) algorithms within the past few years has mostly focused on their performance as point estimators. However, this is insufficient for conducting statistical inference, e.g., constructing confidence intervals and hypothesis testing, since the distribution of the estimator is lacking. In this article, we develop an asymptotic analysis to derive the distribution of RandNLA sampling estimators for the least-squares problem. In particular, we derive the asymptotic distribution of a general sampling estimator with arbitrary sampling probabilities. The analysis is conducted in two complementary settings, i.e., when the objective of interest is to approximate the full sample estimator or is to infer the underlying ground truth model parameters. For each setting, we show that the sampling estimator is asymptotically normally distributed under mild regularity conditions. Moreover, the sampling estimator is asymptotically unbiased in both settings. Based on our asymptotic analysis, we use two criteria, the Asymptotic Mean Squared Error (AMSE) and the Expected Asymptotic Mean Squared Error (EAMSE), to identify optimal sampling probabilities. Several of these optimal sampling probability distributions are new to the literature, e.g., the root leverage sampling estimator and the predictor length sampling estimator. Our theoretical results clarify the role of leverage in the sampling process, and our empirical results demonstrate improvements over existing methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑