arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2002.05379cs.LGstat.ML

条件熵瓶颈

The Conditional Entropy Bottleneck

Google Research(谷歌研究院)

Ian Fischer

AI总结:

针对机器学习鲁棒泛化失效问题,提出最小必要信息准则与条件熵瓶颈目标函数,实验验证其可改善对抗样本脆弱性、分布外检测差等鲁棒泛化问题。

摘要:

机器学习领域存在一系列突出的失效模式,包括易受对抗样本攻击、分布外(OoD)检测效果差、校准失准,以及倾向于记忆数据集的随机标签。我们将这些问题归类为鲁棒泛化失效,这拓展了传统泛化性的衡量标准——即仅以测试集上的准确率或相关指标评估泛化能力的方式。我们假设,这类鲁棒泛化失效的根源在于学习系统保留了过多与训练数据相关的信息。为验证该假设,我们提出了用于评估模型质量的最小必要信息(Minimum Necessary Information, MNI)准则。为训练出在MNI准则下表现优异的模型,我们提出了一种新的目标函数——条件熵瓶颈(Conditional Entropy Bottleneck, CEB),它与信息瓶颈(Information Bottleneck, IB)密切相关。我们通过在多种不同数据集和鲁棒性挑战任务上,将CEB模型与确定性模型、变分信息瓶颈(Variational Information Bottleneck, VIB)模型的性能进行对比,以实验验证我们的假设。我们发现了强有力的实证证据,支持MNI模型能够改善上述鲁棒泛化问题的假设。

英文摘要:

Much of the field of Machine Learning exhibits a prominent set of failure modes, including vulnerability to adversarial examples, poor out-of-distribution (OoD) detection, miscalibration, and willingness to memorize random labelings of datasets. We characterize these as failures of robust generalization, which extends the traditional measure of generalization as accuracy or related metrics on a held-out set. We hypothesize that these failures to robustly generalize are due to the learning systems retaining too much information about the training data. To test this hypothesis, we propose the Minimum Necessary Information (MNI) criterion for evaluating the quality of a model. In order to train models that perform well with respect to the MNI criterion, we present a new objective function, the Conditional Entropy Bottleneck (CEB), which is closely related to the Information Bottleneck (IB). We experimentally test our hypothesis by comparing the performance of CEB models with deterministic models and Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) models on a variety of different datasets and robustness challenges. We find strong empirical evidence supporting our hypothesis that MNI models improve on these problems of robust generalization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑