arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2002.04599cs.LGcs.CRcs.CVstat.ML

Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbations

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);University of Bremen(不来梅大学);Google Brain(谷歌大脑);Vector Institute(向量研究所);University of Toronto(多伦多大学)

Florian Tramèr, Jens Behrmann, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas Papernot, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen

英文摘要:

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to induce misclassification. Commonly studied sensitivity-based adversarial examples introduce semantically-small changes to an input that result in a different model prediction. This paper studies a complementary failure mode, invariance-based adversarial examples, that introduce minimal semantic changes that modify an input's true label yet preserve the model's prediction. We demonstrate fundamental tradeoffs between these two types of adversarial examples. We show that defenses against sensitivity-based attacks actively harm a model's accuracy on invariance-based attacks, and that new approaches are needed to resist both attack types. In particular, we break state-of-the-art adversarially-trained and certifiably-robust models by generating small perturbations that the models are (provably) robust to, yet that change an input's class according to human labelers. Finally, we formally show that the existence of excessively invariant classifiers arises from the presence of overly-robust predictive features in standard datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑