arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2001.10591cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph
收藏

从机器学习的形成能对化合物稳定性预测的批判性检查

A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies

Christopher J. Bartel, Amalie Trewartha, Qi Wang, Alexander Dunn, Anubhav Jain, Gerbrand Ceder

摘要:

机器学习已经成为一种有效预测材料性质的新工具,并且已经声称用于化合物形成能的机器学习模型可以接近密度泛函理论(DFT)的准确性。在这项工作中测试的模型包括五个最近发表的组成模型,一个基线模型,仅使用化学计量,和一个结构模型。通过使用DFT计算的材料项目数据库对85,014种独特的化学成分进行稳定性预测的7种机器学习模型进行测试,我们表明,虽然形成能确实可以很好地预测,但所有组成模型在预测化合物的稳定性方面表现不佳,使得它们在发现和设计新固体方面比DFT有用得多。最关键的是,在稀疏的化学空间中,很少有化学计量具有稳定的化合物,只有结构模型能够有效地检测哪些材料是稳定的。与成分模型相比,结构模型的非增量改进是值得注意的,并鼓励使用结构模型进行材料发现,对于任何新的组合物,基态结构都不是先验已知的。这项工作表明,准确的预测地层能量并不意味着准确的预测稳定性,强调评估模型性能的重要性稳定性预测,我们提供了一套公开的测试。

英文摘要:

Machine learning has emerged as a novel tool for the efficient prediction of materials properties, and claims have been made that machine-learned models for the formation energy of compounds can approach the accuracy of Density Functional Theory (DFT). The models tested in this work include five recently published compositional models, a baseline model using stoichiometry alone, and a structural model. By testing seven machine learning models for formation energy on stability predictions using the Materials Project database of DFT calculations for 85,014 unique chemical compositions, we show that while formation energies can indeed be predicted well, all compositional models perform poorly on predicting the stability of compounds, making them considerably less useful than DFT for the discovery and design of new solids. Most critically, in sparse chemical spaces where few stoichiometries have stable compounds, only the structural model is capable of efficiently detecting which materials are stable. The non-incremental improvement of structural models compared with compositional models is noteworthy and encourages the use of structural models for materials discovery, with the constraint that for any new composition, the ground-state structure is not known a priori. This work demonstrates that accurate predictions of formation energy do not imply accurate predictions of stability, emphasizing the importance of assessing model performance on stability predictions, for which we provide a set of publicly available tests.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑