arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2001.09768cs.CY
收藏

人工智能、价值观和一致性

Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignment

Iason Gabriel

摘要:

本文着眼于AI对齐背景下出现的哲学问题。它捍卫三个命题。首先,人工智能对齐问题的规范和技术方面是相互关联的,为在这两个领域工作的人之间的有效参与创造了空间。其次,要明确看齐目标。人工智能与指令、意图、显示的偏好、理想偏好、兴趣和价值观之间存在显著差异。基于原则的人工智能对齐方法,以系统的方式结合这些元素,在这种情况下具有相当大的优势。第三,理论家面临的核心挑战不是为人工智能确定“真正的”道德原则;相反,它是为对齐确定公平的原则,尽管人们的道德信仰存在广泛的差异,但这些原则得到了反思性的认可。本文的最后一部分探讨了三种可能识别AI对齐的公平原则的方法。

英文摘要:

This paper looks at philosophical questions that arise in the context of AI alignment. It defends three propositions. First, normative and technical aspects of the AI alignment problem are interrelated, creating space for productive engagement between people working in both domains. Second, it is important to be clear about the goal of alignment. There are significant differences between AI that aligns with instructions, intentions, revealed preferences, ideal preferences, interests and values. A principle-based approach to AI alignment, which combines these elements in a systematic way, has considerable advantages in this context. Third, the central challenge for theorists is not to identify 'true' moral principles for AI; rather, it is to identify fair principles for alignment, that receive reflective endorsement despite widespread variation in people's moral beliefs. The final part of the paper explores three ways in which fair principles for AI alignment could potentially be identified.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑