arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.07495cs.LGcs.AI

无监督学习表示:探索是否该终结?

Unsupervisedly Learned Representations: Should the Quest be Over?

Daniel N. Nissani

AI总结:

本文指出无监督学习表示与动物准确率存在20%差距,证明强化学习在真实环境中无需标签可视为无监督学习,在模拟环境中需标签则属监督学习,认为继续寻找模拟环境中的无监督范式可能徒劳。

摘要:

经过四十年的研究,我们最好的无监督学习表示方法与智能动物所达到的准确率之间,仍存在约20%的分类准确率差距。因此,我们很可能找错了方向。本文提出了一种解决这一谜题的可能方案。我们证明了Reinforcement Learning(强化学习)能够学习到与动物准确率相当的表示。我们主要的微小贡献在于以下观察:a. 当应用于真实世界环境时,Reinforcement Learning不需要标签,因此可以合理地被视为无监督学习;b. 相反,当Reinforcement Learning应用于模拟环境时,它本质上需要标签,因此通常应被视为监督学习。这些观察的推论是,进一步寻找可在模拟环境中训练的无监督学习竞争范式可能是徒劳的。

英文摘要:

After four decades of research there still exists a Classification accuracy gap of about 20% between our best Unsupervisedly Learned Representations methods and the accuracy rates achieved by intelligent animals. It thus may well be that we are looking in the wrong direction. A possible solution to this puzzle is presented. We demonstrate that Reinforcement Learning can learn representations which achieve the same accuracy as that of animals. Our main modest contribution lies in the observations that: a. when applied to a real world environment Reinforcement Learning does not require labels, and thus may be legitimately considered as Unsupervised Learning, and b. in contrast, when Reinforcement Learning is applied in a simulated environment it does inherently require labels and should thus be generally be considered as Supervised Learning. The corollary of these observations is that further search for Unsupervised Learning competitive paradigms which may be trained in simulated environments may be futile.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑