arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2001.03258stat.ME
收藏

基于纵向移动健康数据的个性化策略学习

Personalized Policy Learning using Longitudinal Mobile Health Data

Xinyu Hu, Min Qian, Bin Cheng, Ying Kuen Cheung

摘要:

我们使用纵向移动健康应用程序使用数据来解决个性化策略学习问题。个性化策略代表了一种范式的转变,从制定一个单一的政策,可以规定个性化的决策定制。具体而言,我们的目标是制定最佳的政策,每个用户,根据广义线性混合模型下估计随机效应。在有许多随机效应的情况下,我们考虑了新的估计方法和惩罚目标,以避免边缘似然近似的高维积分。我们建立了我们的方法与内源性应用程序使用的一致性和最优性。我们应用我们的方法来开发个性化的推送(“提示”)时间表在294应用程序用户,目标是最大限度地提高过去的应用程序使用和其他上下文因素的提示响应率。我们发现,最好的推送时间表相同的协变量不同的用户之间,从而呼吁个性化的政策。使用估计的个性化策略将在16周或更长时间内实现这些用户的平均即时响应率为23%:这是对观察到的比率(11%)的显着改善,而文献表明下载后3个月的用户参与度为3%-15%。所提出的方法相比,有利的现有的估计方法,包括使用R函数“glmer”在模拟研究。

英文摘要:

We address the personalized policy learning problem using longitudinal mobile health application usage data. Personalized policy represents a paradigm shift from developing a single policy that may prescribe personalized decisions by tailoring. Specifically, we aim to develop the best policy, one per user, based on estimating random effects under generalized linear mixed model. With many random effects, we consider new estimation method and penalized objective to circumvent high-dimension integrals for marginal likelihood approximation. We establish consistency and optimality of our method with endogenous app usage. We apply our method to develop personalized push ("prompt") schedules in 294 app users, with a goal to maximize the prompt response rate given past app usage and other contextual factors. We found the best push schedule given the same covariates varied among the users, thus calling for personalized policies. Using the estimated personalized policies would have achieved a mean prompt response rate of 23% in these users at 16 weeks or later: this is a remarkable improvement on the observed rate (11%), while the literature suggests 3%-15% user engagement at 3 months after download. The proposed method compares favorably to existing estimation methods including using the R function "glmer" in a simulation study.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑