Albert, an intermediate smart-contract language for the Tezos blockchain

Bruno Bernardo, Raphaël Cauderlier, Basile Pesin, Julien Tesson

备注：: 15 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1909.08671

英文摘要：

Tezos is a smart-contract blockchain. Tezos smart contracts are written in a low-level stack-based language called Michelson. In this article we present Albert, an intermediate language for Tezos smart contracts which abstracts Michelson stacks as linearly typed records. We also describe its compiler to Michelson, written in Coq, that targets Mi-Cho-Coq, a formal specification of Michelson implemented in Coq.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

阅读原文

阅读 PDF ↗

arXiv 页面 ↗HTML 原文 ↗

本文内容

英文摘要相关论文

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

继续探索

相关论文

Making Tezos smart contracts more reliable with Coq

Tezos is a smart-contract blockchain. Tezos smart contracts are written in a low-level stack-based language called Michelson. This article gives an overview of efforts using the Coq proof assistant to have stronger guarantees on Michelson smart contracts: the Mi-Cho-Coq framework, a Coq library defining formal semantics of Michelson, as well as an interpreter, a simple optimiser and a weakest-precondition calculus to reason about Michelson smart contracts; Albert, an intermediate language that abstracts Michelson stacks with a compiler written in Coq that targets Mi-Cho-Coq.

2021-06-24cs.PL

Mi-Cho-Coq, a framework for certifying Tezos Smart Contracts

Tezos is a blockchain launched in June 2018. It is written in OCaml and supports smart contracts. Its smart contract language is called Michelson and it has been designed with formal verification in mind. In this article, we present Mi-Cho-Coq, a Coq framework for verifying the functional correctness of Michelson smart contracts. As a case study, we detail the certification of a Multisig contract with the Mi-Cho-Coq framework.

2019-09-18cs.PL

HELMHOLTZ: A Verifier for Tezos Smart Contracts Based on Refinement Types

DaiLambda, Inc.（DaiLambda公司）；Kyoto University（京都大学）

A smart contract is a program executed on a blockchain, based on which many cryptocurrencies are implemented, and is being used for automating transactions. Due to the large amount of money that smart contracts deal with, there is a surging demand for a method that can statically and formally verify them. This article describes our type-based static verification tool HELMHOLTZ for Michelson, which is a statically typed stack-based language for writing smart contracts that are executed on the blockchain platform Tezos. HELMHOLTZ is designed on top of our extension of Michelson's type system wit…

2021-09-10cs.CLcs.LOcs.PL

A Typed Programmatic Interface to Contracts on the Blockchain

Smart contract applications on the blockchain can only reach their full potential if they integrate seamlessly with traditional software systems via a programmatic interface. This interface should provide for originating and invoking contracts as well as observing the state of the blockchain. We propose a typed API for this purpose and establish some properties of the combined system. Specifically, we provide an execution model that enables us to prove type-safe interaction between programs and the blockchain. We establish further properties of the model that give rise to requirements on the A…

2021-08-29cs.PL

WhylSon: Proving your Michelson Smart Contracts in Why3

This paper introduces WhylSon, a deductive verification tool for smart contracts written in Michelson, which is the low-level language of the Tezos blockchain. WhylSon accepts a formally specified Michelson contract and automatically translates it to an equivalent program written in WhyML, the programming and specification language of the Why3 framework. Smart contract instructions are mapped into a corresponding WhyML shallow-embedding of the their axiomatic semantics, which we also developed in the context of this work. One major advantage of this approach is that it allows an out-of-the-box…

2020-05-29cs.PL

Finding smart contract vulnerabilities with ConCert's property-based testing framework

We provide three detailed case studies of vulnerabilities in smart contracts, and show how property-based testing would have found them: 1. the Dexter1 token exchange; 2. the iToken; 3. the ICO of Brave's BAT token. The last example is, in fact, new, and was missed in the auditing process. We have implemented this testing in ConCert, a general executable model/specification of smart contract execution in the Coq proof assistant. ConCert contracts can be used to generate verified smart contracts in Tezos' LIGO and Concordium's rust language. We thus show the effectiveness of combining formal ve…

2022-08-01cs.LOcs.PL

更多相关论文收起更多论文

Smart Contract Interactions in Coq

We present a model/executable specification of smart contract execution in Coq. Our formalization allows for inter-contract communication and generalizes existing work by allowing modelling of both depth-first execution blockchains (like Ethereum) and breadth-first execution blockchains (like Tezos). We represent smart contracts programs in Coq's functional language Gallina, enabling easier reasoning about functional correctness of concrete contracts than other approaches. In particular we develop a Congress contract in this style. This contract -- a simplified version of the infamous DAO -- i…

2019-11-12cs.LOcs.PL

Extracting Smart Contracts Tested and Verified in Coq

We implement extraction of Coq programs to functional languages based on MetaCoq's certified erasure. As part of this, we implement an optimisation pass removing unused arguments. We prove the pass correct wrt. a conventional call-by-value operational semantics of functional languages. We apply this to two functional smart contract languages, Liquidity and Midlang, and to the functional language Elm. Our development is done in the context of the ConCert framework that enables smart contract verification. We contribute a verified boardroom voting smart contract featuring maximum voter privacy s…

2021-04-26cs.LOcs.PL

Abstract interpretation of Michelson smart-contracts

Static analysis of smart-contracts is becoming more widespread on blockchain platforms. Analyzers rely on techniques like symbolic execution or model checking, but few of them can provide strong soundness properties and guarantee the analysis termination at the same time. As smart-contracts often manipulate economic assets, proving numerical properties beyond the absence of runtime errors is also desirable. Smart-contract execution models differ considerably from mainstream programming languages and vary from one blockchain to another, making state-of-the-art analyses hard to adapt. For instan…

2022-10-11cs.CRcs.PLcs.SE