多准则决策分析与SRF-II方法比较适应性再利用的一个标志性历史建筑的假设
Multiple criteria decision analysis with the SRF-II method to compare hypotheses of adaptive reuse for an iconic historical building
摘要：
本文展示了如何多标准决策辅助（MCDA）工具可以支持六个假设的适应性再利用的标志性历史建筑在意大利都灵（称为证券交易所），以确定首选的替代品的分析。在过去两年中，围绕该建筑重新认证的辩论一直很激烈，原因有几个：它被公民视为“纪念碑”;它显示了国家承认的建筑和类型价值;它涉及公共和私人利益。在这种情况下，与参与正在进行的讨论的专家互动，我们考虑了最近提出的四种MCDA方法的结合，即：多准则层次过程（MCHP），允许考虑准则之间的结构关系; ELECTRE III，考虑三种类型的准则之间的相互作用效应（加强、削弱和拮抗作用）;不精确的SRF方法，提供了一种易于理解的方法来从DM收集信息;和随机多标准可接受性分析（SMAA），提供了强大的建议，在排名和优先关系，无差异和项目之间的不可比性，在每一个层次结构。我们提出了一个修改的SRF方法，称为SFR-II，以增加决策辅助程序的可靠性，这可能构成一个显着的进步，为同一SRF方法。
英文摘要：
The paper shows how Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA) tools can support the analyses of six hypotheses of adaptive reuse of an iconic historical building in Turin, Italy (called Stock Exchange) to identify the preferred alternative. In the last two years, the debate around the requalification of the building has been huge for several reasons: it is perceived as a "monument" by citizens; it shows architectural and typological values nationally recognized; it involves public and private interests. In this context, interacting with experts involved in the ongoing discussion, we consider a recently proposed conjunction of four MCDA methods, namely: Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process (MCHP), permitting to consider structural relationships between criteria; ELECTRE III, considering three types of interaction effects between criteria (strengthening, weakening and antagonistic effects); the imprecise SRF method, supplying an easily understandable approach to collect information from the DM; and Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA), providing robust recommendation, in terms of rankings and relations of preference, indifference and incomparability between project alternatives, at each level of the hierarchy. We propose a modification of the SRF methodology, called SFR-II, to increase the reliability of the decision aid procedure, which could constitute a significant advance for the same SRF method.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
