arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.01190math.CO
收藏

关于匹配覆盖图中紧割的一个注记

A note on tight cuts in matching-covered graphs

Xiao Zhao, Sheng Chen

AI总结:

本文简化了关于匹配覆盖图中非平凡紧割与ELP割关系的猜想证明,并证明了更强的结果:非ELP紧割可通过一系列ELP割收缩转化为2-分离割。

摘要:

Edmonds、Lovász和Pulleyblank证明了如果一个匹配覆盖图有一个非平凡的紧割,那么它也有一个非平凡的ELP割。Carvalho等人给出了一个更强的猜想:如果一个匹配覆盖图有一个非平凡的紧割$C$,那么它也有一个不与$C$相交的非平凡ELP割。Chen等人给出了该猜想的一个证明。本注记受Carvalho等人论文的启发。我们给出了该猜想的一个简化证明,并证明了以下结果,该结果比猜想稍强:如果匹配覆盖图$G$的一个非平凡紧割$C$不是ELP割,那么存在一个匹配覆盖图的序列$G_1=G, G_2,\ldots,G_r, r\geq2$,使得对于$i=1, 2,\ldots, r-1$,$G_i$有一个ELP割$C_i$,且$G_{i+1}$是$G_i$的$C_i$-收缩,并且$C$是$G_r$的一个$2$-分离割。

英文摘要:

Edmonds, Lovász, and Pulleyblank showed that if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut. Carvalho et al. gave a stronger conjecture: if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut $C$, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut that does not cross $C$. Chen, et al gave a proof of the conjecture. This note is inspired by the paper of Carvalho et al. We give a simplified proof of the conjecture, and prove the following result which is slightly stronger than the conjecture: if a nontrivial tight cut $C$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is not an ELP-cut, then there is a sequence $G_1=G, G_2,\ldots,G_r, r\geq2$ of matching covered graphs, such that for $i=1, 2,\ldots, r-1$, $G_i$ has an ELP-cut $C_i$, and $G_{i+1}$ is a $C_i$-contraction of $G_i$, and $C$ is a $2$-separation cut of $G_r$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑