arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1909.12902cs.CVcs.IRcs.LG
收藏

Interpreting Distortions in Dimensionality Reduction by Superimposing Neighbourhood Graphs

Univ. Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学);INES(法国国家太阳能研究所);Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc(萨瓦蒙勃朗大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);LAMA(数学与应用数学实验室)

Benoît Colange, Laurent Vuillon, Sylvain Lespinats, Denys Dutykh

英文摘要:

To perform visual data exploration, many dimensionality reduction methods have been developed. These tools allow data analysts to represent multidimensional data in a 2D or 3D space, while preserving as much relevant information as possible. Yet, they cannot preserve all structures simultaneously and they induce some unavoidable distortions. Hence, many criteria have been introduced to evaluate a map's overall quality, mostly based on the preservation of neighbourhoods. Such global indicators are currently used to compare several maps, which helps to choose the most appropriate mapping method and its hyperparameters. However, those aggregated indicators tend to hide the local repartition of distortions. Thereby, they need to be supplemented by local evaluation to ensure correct interpretation of maps. In this paper, we describe a new method, called MING, for `Map Interpretation using Neighbourhood Graphs'. It offers a graphical interpretation of pairs of map quality indicators, as well as local evaluation of the distortions. This is done by displaying on the map the nearest neighbours graphs computed in the data space and in the embedding. Shared and unshared edges exhibit reliable and unreliable neighbourhood information conveyed by the mapping. By this mean, analysts may determine whether proximity (or remoteness) of points on the map faithfully represents similarity (or dissimilarity) of original data, within the meaning of a chosen map quality criteria. We apply this approach to two pairs of widespread indicators: precision/recall and trustworthiness/continuity, chosen for their wide use in the community, which will allow an easy handling by users.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑