arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.08444stat.ME

通过 Polya 树进行高维广义线性模型中的非参数收缩估计

Nonparametric Shrinkage Estimation in High Dimensional Generalized Linear Models via Polya Trees

Asaf Weinstein, Jonas Wallin, Daniel Yekutieli, Małgorzata Bogdan

AI总结:

本文针对高维固定效应广义线性模型,提出基于 Polya 树先验的分层 Bayes 非参数收缩估计,以逼近排列不变的理想 oracle 估计,并在数值实验中取得更优估计与预测精度。

摘要:

在过去几十年中,拟合回归模型时的正则化一直是一个非常活跃的研究课题,但现有大多数方法都是为特定情形设计的,例如系数向量稀疏的情形。我们考虑在给定的具有固定效应的广义线性模型中设计普适最优正则化估计量的问题。首先,我们提出一种 Bayes 估计量作为候选,它对应于一个理想先验;该先验对固定系数向量的每一种排列赋予相同的质量,因此仅通过真实系数的经验 CDF 依赖于这些系数。我们证明了这一 oracle 估计量在频率派和 Bayes 框架下的若干最优性性质。为了与该 oracle 估计量竞争,我们设定了一个分层 Bayes 模型,其中各个系数被建模为来自共同分布 π 的 i.i.d. 抽样,而 π 又被赋予 Polya 树先验以反映不确定性。我们通过示例表明,在所设定模型下,π 的后验均值能够非参数地适应真实系数的经验 CDF。相应地,系数本身的后验均值被用来模拟该理想估计量。数值实验表明,与多种参数化和非参数替代方法相比——从相对标准的 L_p 正则化估计量,到用于高维回归的现代惩罚似然和 Bayes 估计量——我们的方法具有更好的估计和预测精度。

英文摘要:

Regularization in fitting regression models has been a highly active topic of research in the past few decades, but most of the existing methods are designed for particular situations, e.g. for the case of a sparse coefficient vector. We consider the problem of designing $\textit{universally}$ optimal regularized estimators in a given generalized linear model with fixed effects. First, we propose as a contender the Bayes estimator against an $\textit{ideal}$ prior that assigns equal mass to every permutation of the fixed coefficient vector, thus depending on the true coefficients only through their empirical CDF. We prove some optimality properties of this oracle estimator in both the frequentist and Bayesian frameworks. To compete with the oracle estimator, we posit a hierarchical Bayes model where the individual coefficients are modeled as i.i.d. draws from a common distribution $π$, which is in turn assigned a Polya tree prior to reflect indefiniteness. We demonstrate in examples that the posterior mean of $π$ under the postulated model adapts nonparametrically to the empirical CDF of the true coefficients. Correspondingly, the posterior means of the coefficients themselves are used to mimic the ideal estimator. Numerical experiments show that our method has better estimation and prediction accuracy compared to various parametric and nonparametric alternatives, from relatively standard $L_p$-regularized estimators to modern penalized-likelihood and Bayesian estimators for high dimensional regression.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑