arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.02899cs.CL
收藏

神经语言表征学习物理常识吗?

Do Neural Language Representations Learn Physical Commonsense?

University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence(艾伦人工智能研究所)

Maxwell Forbes, Ari Holtzman, Yejin Choi

摘要:

人类理解语言是基于丰富的关于物理世界如何运作的背景知识,这反过来又允许我们通过语言来推理物理世界。除了对象的属性(例如,船需要燃料)和它们的可供性,即,适用于它们的动作(例如,船可以被驾驶),我们还可以推理关于对象的什么属性暗示适用于它们的动作种类之间的if-then推断(例如,如果我们能驾驶某样东西,那么它可能需要燃料)。在本文中,我们研究了在大量自然语言文本上训练的最先进的神经语言表示在多大程度上展示了物理常识推理。虽然神经语言模型的最新进展在各种类型的自然语言推理任务上表现出了强大的性能,但我们基于超过20万个新收集的注释数据集的研究表明,神经语言表示仍然只学习明确写下的关联。

英文摘要:

Humans understand language based on the rich background knowledge about how the physical world works, which in turn allows us to reason about the physical world through language. In addition to the properties of objects (e.g., boats require fuel) and their affordances, i.e., the actions that are applicable to them (e.g., boats can be driven), we can also reason about if-then inferences between what properties of objects imply the kind of actions that are applicable to them (e.g., that if we can drive something then it likely requires fuel). In this paper, we investigate the extent to which state-of-the-art neural language representations, trained on a vast amount of natural language text, demonstrate physical commonsense reasoning. While recent advancements of neural language models have demonstrated strong performance on various types of natural language inference tasks, our study based on a dataset of over 200k newly collected annotations suggests that neural language representations still only learn associations that are explicitly written down.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑