arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1908.02899cs.CL
收藏

Do Neural Language Representations Learn Physical Commonsense?

University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence(艾伦人工智能研究所)

Maxwell Forbes, Ari Holtzman, Yejin Choi

英文摘要:

Humans understand language based on the rich background knowledge about how the physical world works, which in turn allows us to reason about the physical world through language. In addition to the properties of objects (e.g., boats require fuel) and their affordances, i.e., the actions that are applicable to them (e.g., boats can be driven), we can also reason about if-then inferences between what properties of objects imply the kind of actions that are applicable to them (e.g., that if we can drive something then it likely requires fuel). In this paper, we investigate the extent to which state-of-the-art neural language representations, trained on a vast amount of natural language text, demonstrate physical commonsense reasoning. While recent advancements of neural language models have demonstrated strong performance on various types of natural language inference tasks, our study based on a dataset of over 200k newly collected annotations suggests that neural language representations still only learn associations that are explicitly written down.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑