arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1907.03464quant-phphysics.hist-ph
收藏

Complementarity has empirically relevant consequences for the definition of quantum states

Bradley A. Foreman

英文摘要:

The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which first took shape in Bohr's landmark 1928 paper on complementarity, remains an enigma. Although many physicists are skeptical about the necessity of Bohr's philosophical conclusions, his pragmatic message about the importance of the whole experimental arrangement is widely accepted. It is, however, generally also agreed that the Copenhagen interpretation has no direct consequences for the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Here I show that the application of Bohr's main concepts of complementarity to the subsystems of a closed system requires a change in the definition of the quantum state. The appropriate definition is as an equivalence class similar to that used by von Neumann to describe macroscopic subsystems. He showed that such equivalence classes are necessary in order to maximize information entropy and achieve agreement with experimental entropy. However, the significance of these results for the quantum theory of measurement has been overlooked. Current formulations of measurement theory are therefore manifestly in conflict with experiment. This conflict is resolved by the definition of the quantum state proposed here.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑