arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1907.03338eess.IVcs.CV
收藏

医学图像分割中不确定性估计的可靠性评估与挑战

Assessing Reliability and Challenges of Uncertainty Estimations for Medical Image Segmentation

Insel Data Science Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern(伯尔尼大学伯尔尼大学医院Inselspital Insel数据科学中心);ARTORG Center, University of Bern(伯尔尼大学ARTORG中心)

Alain Jungo, Mauricio Reyes

摘要:

尽管最近整体准确性有所提高,但深度学习系统仍然表现出较低的鲁棒性。检测可能的故障对于这些系统的成功临床集成至关重要,其中每个数据点对应于单个患者。不确定性度量是改进故障检测的一个有前途的方向,因为它们提供了系统置信度的度量。尽管已经提出了许多用于深度学习的不确定性估计方法,但对它们在医学图像分割中的好处和当前挑战知之甚少。因此,我们报告的结果,评估常见的体素方面的不确定性措施的可靠性,和两个医学图像分割数据集的限制。结果表明,目前的不确定性方法执行类似,虽然他们是很好的校准在数据集级别,他们往往是在主题级的误校准。因此,不确定性估计的可靠性受到损害,突出了制定主题不确定性估计的重要性。此外,在基准方法中,我们发现辅助网络是常见不确定性方法的有效替代方案,因为它们可以应用于任何先前训练的分割模型。

英文摘要:

Despite the recent improvements in overall accuracy, deep learning systems still exhibit low levels of robustness. Detecting possible failures is critical for a successful clinical integration of these systems, where each data point corresponds to an individual patient. Uncertainty measures are a promising direction to improve failure detection since they provide a measure of a system's confidence. Although many uncertainty estimation methods have been proposed for deep learning, little is known on their benefits and current challenges for medical image segmentation. Therefore, we report results of evaluating common voxel-wise uncertainty measures with respect to their reliability, and limitations on two medical image segmentation datasets. Results show that current uncertainty methods perform similarly and although they are well-calibrated at the dataset level, they tend to be miscalibrated at subject-level. Therefore, the reliability of uncertainty estimates is compromised, highlighting the importance of developing subject-wise uncertainty estimations. Additionally, among the benchmarked methods, we found auxiliary networks to be a valid alternative to common uncertainty methods since they can be applied to any previously trained segmentation model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑