arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 1906.08826astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMcs.CVcs.LG

Automated crater shape retrieval using weakly-supervised deep learning

Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学);University of Toronto Scarborough(多伦多大学士嘉堡分校);Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics(加拿大理论天体物理研究所);University of Toronto(多伦多大学);Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学)

Mohamad Ali-Dib, Kristen Menou, Alan P. Jackson, Chenchong Zhu, Noah Hammond

英文摘要:

Crater ellipticity determination is a complex and time consuming task that so far has evaded successful automation. We train a state of the art computer vision algorithm to identify craters in Lunar digital elevation maps and retrieve their sizes and 2D shapes. The computational backbone of the model is MaskRCNN, an "instance segmentation" general framework that detects craters in an image while simultaneously producing a mask for each crater that traces its outer rim. Our post-processing pipeline then finds the closest fitting ellipse to these masks, allowing us to retrieve the crater ellipticities. Our model is able to correctly identify 87\% of known craters in the longitude range we hid from the network during training and validation (test set), while predicting thousands of additional craters not present in our training data. Manual validation of a subset of these "new" craters indicates that a majority of them are real, which we take as an indicator of the strength of our model in learning to identify craters, despite incomplete training data. The crater size, ellipticity, and depth distributions predicted by our model are consistent with human-generated results. The model allows us to perform a large scale search for differences in crater diameter and shape distributions between the lunar highlands and maria, and we exclude any such differences with a high statistical significance. The predicted test set catalogue and trained model are available here: https://github.com/malidib/Craters_MaskRCNN/.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑