arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 1906.08430cs.LGcs.CLcs.CVstat.ML

Adversarial Regularization for Visual Question Answering: Strengths, Shortcomings, and Side Effects

Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences(哈佛大学约翰·A·保尔森工程与应用科学学院);MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory(麻省理工学院计算机科学与人工智能实验室)

Gabriel Grand, Yonatan Belinkov

英文摘要:

Visual question answering (VQA) models have been shown to over-rely on linguistic biases in VQA datasets, answering questions "blindly" without considering visual context. Adversarial regularization (AdvReg) aims to address this issue via an adversary sub-network that encourages the main model to learn a bias-free representation of the question. In this work, we investigate the strengths and shortcomings of AdvReg with the goal of better understanding how it affects inference in VQA models. Despite achieving a new state-of-the-art on VQA-CP, we find that AdvReg yields several undesirable side-effects, including unstable gradients and sharply reduced performance on in-domain examples. We demonstrate that gradual introduction of regularization during training helps to alleviate, but not completely solve, these issues. Through error analyses, we observe that AdvReg improves generalization to binary questions, but impairs performance on questions with heterogeneous answer distributions. Qualitatively, we also find that regularized models tend to over-rely on visual features, while ignoring important linguistic cues in the question. Our results suggest that AdvReg requires further refinement before it can be considered a viable bias mitigation technique for VQA.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑