arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1906.06646stat.ME
收藏

SMART的样本量计算

Sample Size Calculations for SMARTs

Eric J. Rose, Eric B. Laber, Marie Davidian, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Ying-Qi Zhao, Michael R. Kosorok

摘要:

序贯多分配随机试验(SMART)被认为是估计和评价治疗方案的金标准。SMART的大小通常被设定为确保用于简单比较的足够功率,例如,两个固定治疗序列的比较。最佳治疗方案的估计是作为二次和假设生成分析的一部分进行的,对估计的最佳方案的正式评价推迟到后续试验。然而,运行后续试验来评估估计的最佳治疗方案是昂贵且耗时的;此外,如果原始试验对于估计最佳方案的效力不足,则在这样的后续试验中待评估的估计的最佳方案可能远非最佳。我们推导出SMART的样本量程序,以确保:(i)有足够的把握度将最佳治疗方案与标准治疗方案进行比较;以及(ii)估计的最佳方案在高概率的真实最佳方案的给定公差范围内。我们建立的渐近有效性所提出的程序,并证明其有限样本的性能在一系列的模拟实验。

英文摘要:

Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) are considered the gold standard for estimation and evaluation of treatment regimes. SMARTs are typically sized to ensure sufficient power for a simple comparison, e.g., the comparison of two fixed treatment sequences. Estimation of an optimal treatment regime is conducted as part of a secondary and hypothesis-generating analysis with formal evaluation of the estimated optimal regime deferred to a follow-up trial. However, running a follow-up trial to evaluate an estimated optimal treatment regime is costly and time-consuming; furthermore, the estimated optimal regime that is to be evaluated in such a follow-up trial may be far from optimal if the original trial was underpowered for estimation of an optimal regime. We derive sample size procedures for a SMART that ensure: (i) sufficient power for comparing the optimal treatment regime with standard of care; and (ii) the estimated optimal regime is within a given tolerance of the true optimal regime with high-probability. We establish asymptotic validity of the proposed procedures and demonstrate their finite sample performance in a series of simulation experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑