专业化与多样化研究成果的作者分析
Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output
摘要：
本研究探讨了专业化与多样化研究的合作幅度和类型（校内、校外、国内或国际）与产出之间的关系。通过专业化或多样化的研究，我们的意思是在或超越作者的主要研究课题。观测领域是五年来约23，500名学者的科学成果。分析是在总体和学科层面进行的。结果导致的结论是，在一般情况下，多样化的研究成果并不经常是合作的成果比专门的研究。在特定的合作类型的水平上，国际合作弱的基础上的专业化的研究成果;相反，校外国内和校内的合作与多元化的研究弱相关。虽然协会的弱点仍然存在，但在个别学科一级观察到例外情况。
英文摘要：
The present work investigates the relations between amplitude and type of collaboration (intramural, extramural domestic or international) and output of specialized versus diversified research. By specialized or diversified research, we mean within or beyond the author's dominant research topic. The field of observation is the scientific production over five years from about 23,500 academics. The analyses are conducted at the aggregate and disciplinary level. The results lead to the conclusion that in general, the output of diversified research is no more frequently the fruit of collaboration than is specialized research. At the level of the particular collaboration types, international collaborations weakly underlie the specialized kind of research output; on the contrary, extramural domestic and intramural collaborations are weakly associated with diversified research. While the weakness of association remains, exceptions are observed at the level of the individual disciplines.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
