关于更基本的构建块的两个论点
Two arguments for more fundamental building blocks
摘要：
我们提出了两条推理路线，导致比我们所知道的更基本的基本成分。一个这样的论点是新的，并根据全息最大限度的自由度的任何系统的数量。在这种情况下，物质和空间都是涌现的。另一个论点是古老的，由理查德·费曼（Richard Feynman）提出，作为为什么模拟系统描述相同物理的可能解释。前一个论点自然指向了信息悖论的解决方案。后一种观点将类比从纯粹的好奇心提升到对基本理论的可靠检验。有趣的是，费曼和一些现代量子引力研究者给这个基本水平起的名字，例如，雅各布·贝肯斯坦，彼此相似：“Xons”（费曼）与“X级”（贝肯斯坦）。
英文摘要：
We present two lines of reasoning, leading to elementary constituents more fundamental than the ones we know. One such arguments is new, and based on the holographic maximal bound for the number of degrees of freedom of any system. In this case, both matter and space are emergent. The other argument is old, and was given by Richard Feynman as a possible explanation of why analog systems do describe the same physics. The former argument naturally points to a solution of the information paradox. The latter argument elevates analogs from mere curiosities, to reliable tests of fundamental theories. Amusingly, the names given to this fundamental level, both by Feynman and by some of the modern quantum gravity researchers, e.g., Jacob Bekenstein, resemble each others: ``Xons'' (Feynman) vs ``level X'' (Bekenstein).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
