arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1902.03271cs.AIstat.AP
收藏

“人工智能临床医生”是否学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略?

Does the "Artificial Intelligence Clinician" learn optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care?

Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院);Emory University(埃默里大学)

Russell Jeter, Christopher Josef, Supreeth Shashikumar, Shamim Nemati

摘要:

从2017年到2018年,通过PubMed搜索使用关键字“机器学习“发现的科学出版物数量增加了46%(4,317到6,307)。涉及机器学习,人工智能(AI)和大数据的研究结果引起了医疗从业者,医疗管理人员和公众的注意,而此时西医正在努力应对未缓解的成本增加和公众对问责制的要求。机器学习的医疗保健应用所涉及的复杂性以及相关数据集的大小为许多研究人员提供了一个无可争议的机会,可以在相对较少的监督下满足这些需求。在最近的自然医学文章中,“人工智能临床医生学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略”,Komorowski和他的合著者提出了训练人工智能临床医生用血管加压药和静脉输液治疗脓毒症患者的方法。在这篇文章中,我们将仔细研究本文中提出的主张。特别是,我们将研究其AI临床医生建议的个人治疗概况,以深入了解其AI临床医生打算如何在个人层面上治疗患者。

英文摘要:

From 2017 to 2018 the number of scientific publications found via PubMed search using the keyword "Machine Learning" increased by 46% (4,317 to 6,307). The results of studies involving machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data have captured the attention of healthcare practitioners, healthcare managers, and the public at a time when Western medicine grapples with unmitigated cost increases and public demands for accountability. The complexity involved in healthcare applications of machine learning and the size of the associated data sets has afforded many researchers an uncontested opportunity to satisfy these demands with relatively little oversight. In a recent Nature Medicine article, "The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care," Komorowski and his coauthors propose methods to train an artificial intelligence clinician to treat sepsis patients with vasopressors and IV fluids. In this post, we will closely examine the claims laid out in this paper. In particular, we will study the individual treatment profiles suggested by their AI Clinician to gain insight into how their AI Clinician intends to treat patients on an individual level.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑