我们所讲的是我们所实践的吗？需求工程教学大纲的实用性研究--以IREB为例
Do We Preach What We Practice? Investigating the Practical Relevance of Requirements Engineering Syllabi - The IREB Case
摘要：
如今，需求工程（RE）存在过多的不同的教育大纲，所有的目的是纳入实际相关的教育单位（EU）。这些教学大纲中的许多都以某种方式基于国际要求工程委员会（IREB）提供的教学大纲，IREB是一个致力于RE标准化认证计划的非营利组织。国际可再生能源机构的教学大纲由可再生能源专家制定，因此是基于这样的假设，即它们涉及具有实际意义的专题。然而，对于从业人员实际上在多大程度上认为这些内容有用，却知之甚少。我们已经开始了一项研究，以调查IREB基础级认证计划中包含的EU的相关性。在本文报告的第一阶段，我们调查了主要来自DACH国家（德国，奥地利和瑞士）参与IREB认证的从业人员。以后的阶段将扩大范围，包括其他国家，不要求可再生能源理事会认证的参与者。评估结果将促进对以可再生能源机构事实标准大纲为基础的欧盟单位的实际相关性进行批判性反思。
英文摘要：
Nowadays, there exist a plethora of different educational syllabi for Requirements Engineering (RE), all aiming at incorporating practically relevant educational units (EUs). Many of these syllabi are based, in one way or the other, on the syllabi provided by the International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB), a non-profit organisation devoted to standardised certification programs for RE. IREB syllabi are developed by RE experts and are, thus, based on the assumption that they address topics of practical relevance. However, little is known about to what extent practitioners actually perceive those contents as useful. We have started a study to investigate the relevance of the EUs included in the IREB Foundation Level certification programme. In a first phase reported in this paper, we have surveyed practitioners mainly from DACH countries (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) participating in the IREB certification. Later phases will widen the scope both by including other countries and by not requiring IREB-certified participants. The results shall foster a critical reflection on the practical relevance of EUs built upon the de-facto standard syllabus of IREB.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
