arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1812.04608cs.AI

Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospects

Institute for Human and Machine Cognition(人机认知研究所);Michigan Technological University(密歇根理工大学);Macrocognition, LLC(宏认知有限责任公司)

Robert R. Hoffman, Shane T. Mueller, Gary Klein, Jordan Litman

英文摘要:

The question addressed in this paper is: If we present to a user an AI system that explains how it works, how do we know whether the explanation works and the user has achieved a pragmatic understanding of the AI? In other words, how do we know that an explanainable AI system (XAI) is any good? Our focus is on the key concepts of measurement. We discuss specific methods for evaluating: (1) the goodness of explanations, (2) whether users are satisfied by explanations, (3) how well users understand the AI systems, (4) how curiosity motivates the search for explanations, (5) whether the user's trust and reliance on the AI are appropriate, and finally, (6) how the human-XAI work system performs. The recommendations we present derive from our integration of extensive research literatures and our own psychometric evaluations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑