乌克兰文献计量监测科学系统
System of Bibliometric Monitoring Sciences in Ukraine
摘要：
对科学计量学（研究计量）的起源进行了分析，并强调了对科学计量学方法的阐述缺乏重视的问题。会议审议了科学活动成果的评价方法，并注意到从正式的量化指标向根据文献计量指标接受专家结论过渡的趋势。阐述了《莱顿科学计量学宣言》的基本原则，认为科学计量学的基本原则为科学发展提供了明确的监督和支持，并有利于科学环境与社会之间建立建设性的对话。信息和分析系统“Bibliometryka Ukraynskoyi Nauky”（“乌克兰科学文献计量学”）的概念陈述和实际实现的特点由乌克兰国家图书馆Vernadsky阐述。会议审议了关于成立咨询委员会的建议，其目的是通过关于各机构研究活动有效性的结论。证明了通过在东部伙伴关系国家启动类似的文献计量项目及其进一步趋同，为这些国家的科学研究建立一个专家评价共同平台的可行性。
英文摘要：
The origins of scientometrics (research metrics) were analysed and the lack of attention to elaboration of its methodology was emphasized. The approaches to evaluation of scientific activity outcome were considered and the tendency of transition from formal quantitative indicators to receiving expert conclusion on the basis of bibliometric indicators was noted. The principles of the Leiden manifesto of scientometrics were set out, keeping to which provides clear monitoring and support of science development, and favours establishing of the constructive dialog between scientific environment and society as well. The conceptual statements and peculiarities of practical realization of the informative and analytical system "Bibliometryka Ukraynskoyi Nauky" ("Bibliometrics of the Ukrainian Science") elaborated by the Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, are being represented. The proposals on the formation of advisory councils, which are aimed to adopt conclusions on the effectiveness of research activity of institutions, were considered. The feasibility of building a common platform for expert evaluation of scientific studies for countries of the Eastern Partnership by initiating similar bibliometric projects in these countries and their further convergence is proved.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
