arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1809.04088astro-ph.GA
收藏

邻近成星星系0.1微米至1毫米光谱能量分布模型的综合比较

Comprehensive comparison of models for spectral energy distributions from 0.1 micron to 1 mm of nearby star-forming galaxies

L. K. Hunt, I. De Looze, M. Boquien, R. Nikutta, A. Rossi, S. Bianchi, D. A. Dale, G. L. Granato, R. C. Kennicutt, L. Silva, L. Ciesla, M. Relano, S. Viaene, B.… 展开作者

L. K. Hunt, I. De Looze, M. Boquien, R. Nikutta, A. Rossi, S. Bianchi, D. A. Dale, G. L. Granato, R. C. Kennicutt, L. Silva, L. Ciesla, M. Relano, S. Viaene, B. Brandl, D. Calzetti, K. V. Croxall, B. T. Draine, M. Galametz, K. D. Gordon, B. A. Groves, G. Helou, R. Herrera-Camus, J. L. Hinz, J. Koda, S. Salim, K. M. Sandstrom, J. D. Smith, C. D. Wilson, S. Zibetti

摘要:

我们已经适应了远紫外线(FUV),亚毫米(850微米)光谱能量分布(SED)的61个星系从“关键洞察附近的星系:一个远红外线调查与赫歇尔”(KINGFISH)。拟合已使用三个模型:调查银河系演化的代码(CIGALE),GRAPHITE硅酸盐的方法(GRASIL),和银河系物理特性的多波长分析(MAGPHYS)。我们分析了三个代码的结果,在SED形状,并通过比较的导出量与简单的“食谱”的恒星质量(Mstar),恒星形成率(SFR),尘埃质量(Mdust),和单色光度。虽然算法依赖于不同的假设,恒星形成的历史,尘埃衰减和尘埃后处理,他们都很好地近似所观察到的SED和相关的数量一般都很好的协议。然而,这三个代码在中红外区表现出非常不同的行为,特别是在25和70微米之间,其中KINGFISH样品没有观测限制。我们发现,不同的算法给出了不一致的SFR估计低特定的SFR的星系,和标准的“食谱”计算FUV吸收高估的消光相比,SED拟合结果。结果还表明,假设一个“标准”恒定的恒星质光比高估Mstar相对于SED拟合,我们提供了新的SED为基础的配方估计Mstar从WISE W1(3.4微米)的光度和颜色。从主成分分析的Mstar,SFR,Mdust,和O/H,我们重现以前的标度关系Mstar,SFR,和O/H,并发现,Mdust可以预测到大约0.3 dex内仅使用Mstar和SFR。

英文摘要:

We have fit the far-ultraviolet (FUV) to sub-millimeter (850 micron) spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the 61 galaxies from the "Key Insights on Nearby Galaxies: A Far-Infrared Survey with Herschel" (KINGFISH). The fitting has been performed using three models: the Code for Investigating GALaxy Evolution (CIGALE), the GRAphite-SILicate approach (GRASIL), and the Multi-wavelength Analysis of Galaxy PHYSical properties (MAGPHYS). We have analyzed the results of the three codes in terms of the SED shapes, and by comparing the derived quantities with simple "recipes" for stellar mass (Mstar), star-formation rate (SFR), dust mass (Mdust), and monochromatic luminosities. Although the algorithms rely on different assumptions for star-formation history, dust attenuation and dust reprocessing, they all well approximate the observed SEDs and are in generally good agreement for the associated quantities. However, the three codes show very different behavior in the mid-infrared regime, in particular between 25 and 70 micron where there are no observational constraints for the KINGFISH sample. We find that different algorithms give discordant SFR estimates for galaxies with low specific SFR, and that the standard "recipes" for calculating FUV absorption overestimate the extinction compared to the SED-fitting results. Results also suggest that assuming a "standard" constant stellar mass-to-light ratio overestimates Mstar relative to the SED fitting, and we provide new SED-based formulations for estimating Mstar from WISE W1 (3.4 micron) luminosities and colors. From a Principal Component Analysis of Mstar, SFR, Mdust, and O/H, we reproduce previous scaling relations among Mstar, SFR, and O/H, and find that Mdust can be predicted to within roughly 0.3 dex using only Mstar and SFR.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑