定义业务时的资源和能力（内部）视图与环境和市场（外部）视图
Resource and Competence (Internal) View vs. Environment and Market (External) View when defining a Business
摘要：
创业是一种普遍现象，对全球经济增长、创新和社会发展产生了重大影响。然而，人们对创业公司的了解仍然不够，特别是如何开始一项新业务与随后的业绩之间的关系。为了了解这一点，我们进行了一项实证研究，探讨在定义业务时，资源和能力观（内部）与环境和市场观（外部）之间的差异。701名企业家对他们的创业进行了反思，包括九类资源（价值观、愿景、个人目标、员工和合作伙伴、建筑和租赁合同、现金和信贷、专利、知识产权和品牌、产品和服务，最后是收入和赠款）和三个商业使命要素（“关键贡献”、“关键市场”和“区别”）。这似乎是一种倾向，有利于内部的观点，而不是外部的观点。这一趋势在稳定经济体（欧洲）比在新兴经济体（南非）更为明显。在倾向于内部观点和倾向于增加资源之间似乎存在着一种共同的变化。最后，我们发现基于顺序的分析似乎比基于数字的方法更好地解释了两种观点之间的差异。
英文摘要：
Startups is a popular phenomenon that has a significant impact on global economy growth, innovation and society development. However, there is still insufficient understanding about startups, particularly, how to start a new business in the relation to consequent performance. Toward this knowledge, we have performed an empirical study regarding the differences between a Resource and Competence View (Internal) vs Environment and Market View (External) when defining a Business. 701 entrepreneurs have reflected on their startups on nine classes of Resources (values, vision, personal objectives, employees and partners, buildings and rental contracts, cash and credit, patents, IPR's and brands, products and services and finally revenues and grants) and three elements of the Business Mission ("KeyContribution", "KeyMarket" and "Distinction"). It seems to be a tendency to favour the Internal View over the External View. This tendency is clearer in Stable Economies (Europe) than in Emerging Economies (South Africa). There seems to be a co-variation between the tendency to favour the Internal View and the tendency to focus on adding Resources. Finally, we found that an order-based analysis seems to explain the differences between the two views better than a number-based method.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
