评估和支持新出现的研究小组
Assessment and support of emerging research groups
摘要：
本文的出发点是一个桌面研究评估模型，没有适当考虑到研究评估的复杂性，而是基于一系列高度简化的，有问题的假设有关的可用性，有效性和评价意义的研究绩效指标，并资助政策标准。本文提出了一种批评这种模式，并提出了替代评估方法，基于一个明确的评估框架，侧重于先决条件的性能或沟通效果，而不是性能本身，结合指标和专家知识，并使用指标主要是为了设定最低标准。特别关注新兴研究团体中的早期职业科学家，本文讨论了经典文献计量指标和altmetrics的局限性。它提出了旨在支持新兴研究团体的研究机构的替代供资方案。
英文摘要：
The starting point of this paper is a desktop research assessment model that does not take properly into account the complexities of research assessment, but rather bases itself on a series of highly simplifying, questionable assumptions related to the availability, validity and evaluative significance of research performance indicators, and to funding policy criteria. The paper presents a critique of this model, and proposes alternative assessment approaches, based on an explicit evaluative framework, focusing on preconditions to performance or communication effectiveness rather than on performance itself, combining metrics and expert knowledge, and using metrics primarily to set minimum standards. Giving special attention to early career scientists in emerging research groups, the paper discusses the limits of classical bibliometric indicators and altmetrics. It proposes alternative funding formula of research institutions aimed to support emerging research groups.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
