基于瓦赫宁根大学和研究论文参考文献列表中期刊的相异性分析识别多学科研究
Identification of multidisciplinary research based upon dissimilarity analysis of journals included in reference lists of Wageningen University & Research articles
摘要：
本文讨论了可能报告多学科研究的期刊文章的识别。这些文章的识别对于进行研究的机构的战略目的或对研究人员或团体的评估可能是重要的。为了识别可能的多学科研究，本文描述了对2006-2015年瓦赫宁根大学与研究（WUR）工作人员发表的期刊文章中引用的期刊文章的分析。引用文章的期刊从WUR期刊文章的参考文献列表中列出。对于每一篇WUR文章，计算其发表的期刊与包含引用文章的期刊之间的平均差异。差异性来源于期刊之间相似性值的大型矩阵，根据2006-2015年发表的相同WUR文章对这些期刊的共同引用计算。对于2,535种期刊上发表的21,191篇WUR文章，计算了平均差异。对于具有高平均差异的WUR文章，本文表明它们通常发表在多学科期刊上。具有高平均差异的WUR文章也见于非多学科（特定研究领域）期刊。对于这些文章（具有高的平均差异），本文表明，引用往往比具有较低的平均差异的文章，更多的各种研究领域。根据WUR文章计算的平均差异，也可以为他们发表的期刊进行汇总。这导致了一个列表的期刊，而不是可以订购的平均差异的WUR的文章，已发表在他们。本文所描述的分析表明，计算出高平均相异度的期刊往往具有多学科的范围。
英文摘要：
This paper discusses the identification of journal articles that probably report on multidisciplinary research. Identification of these articles may be important for strategic purposes for the institution where the research is performed or for the evaluation of researchers or groups. In order to identify possibly multidisciplinary research, this paper describes an analysis on the journals from which articles have been cited in the journal articles published by Wageningen University & Research (WUR) staff in 2006-2015. The journals with cited articles are inventoried from the reference lists of the WUR journal articles. For each WUR article a mean dissimilarity is calculated between the journal in which it has been published and the journals that contain the cited articles. Dissimilarities are derived from a large matrix with similarity values between journals, calculated from co-citations to these journals from the same WUR articles published in 2006-2015. For 21,191 WUR articles published in 2,535 journals mean dissimilarities have been calculated. For WUR articles with high mean dissimilarities this paper shows that they often are published in multidisciplinary journals. WUR articles with high mean dissimilarities also are found in non-multidisciplinary (research field specific) journals. For these articles (with high mean dissimilarities) this paper shows that citations are often made to more various research fields than for articles with lower mean dissimilarities. The mean dissimilarities, calculated per WUR article, also can be aggregated for the journals in which they have been published. This results in a listing of journals than can be ordered on the mean dissimilarity of the WUR articles that have been published in them. The analysis described in this paper shows that journals for which a high mean dissimilarity is calculated tend to have a multidisciplinary scope.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
