arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1807.02582stat.MLcs.LG
收藏

高斯过程与核方法:联系与等价

Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalences

University of Tübingen(图宾根大学);Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems(马克斯·普朗克智能系统研究所);University of Oxford(牛津大学);Pennsylvania State University(宾夕法尼亚州立大学)

Motonobu Kanagawa, Philipp Hennig, Dino Sejdinovic, Bharath K Sriperumbudur

摘要:

本文试图弥合研究人员之间的概念差距的两个广泛使用的方法的基础上正定内核:贝叶斯学习或推理使用高斯过程的一方,和频率论核方法的基础上再生核希尔伯特空间的另一方。在机器学习中,这两种形式主义是密切相关的;例如,核岭回归的估计量与高斯过程回归的后验均值相同。然而,它们几乎是由两个基本上独立的社区独立研究和开发的,这使得它们之间很难无缝地传输结果。我们的目标是克服这个潜在的困难。为此,我们回顾了几个新旧的结果和概念,从任何一方,并并列算法量从每个框架,以突出密切的相似之处。我们还提供了两种方法之间微妙的哲学和理论差异的讨论。

英文摘要:

This paper is an attempt to bridge the conceptual gaps between researchers working on the two widely used approaches based on positive definite kernels: Bayesian learning or inference using Gaussian processes on the one side, and frequentist kernel methods based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces on the other. It is widely known in machine learning that these two formalisms are closely related; for instance, the estimator of kernel ridge regression is identical to the posterior mean of Gaussian process regression. However, they have been studied and developed almost independently by two essentially separate communities, and this makes it difficult to seamlessly transfer results between them. Our aim is to overcome this potential difficulty. To this end, we review several old and new results and concepts from either side, and juxtapose algorithmic quantities from each framework to highlight close similarities. We also provide discussions on subtle philosophical and theoretical differences between the two approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑