arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1806.02201cs.SI
收藏

Twitter学术指标

Scholarly Twitter metrics

Stefanie Haustein

摘要:

Twitter可以说是构成所谓altmetrics基础的数据源中最受欢迎的。学术文献的推文被认为是引用的早期指标,也是社会影响的衡量标准。本章从批判的角度概述了作为学术指标基础的Twitter活动,并同样描述了学术Twitter指标的潜力和局限性。通过回顾Twitter上的学术交流文献,并分析2400万条链接到学术文献的推文,它的目的是提供一个基本的理解,什么推文可以和不能衡量的研究评估的背景下。超越有限的解释力的低相关性之间的tweets和引文,本章考虑什么类型的学术文件是流行的Twitter上,以及如何,何时和由谁来传播,以了解什么tweets学术文件的措施。虽然本章无法解决与从社交媒体创建有意义的指标相关的问题,但它强调了一些特定的问题,旨在为高级学术Twitter指标提供基础。

英文摘要:

Twitter has arguably been the most popular among the data sources that form the basis of so-called altmetrics. Tweets to scholarly documents have been heralded as both early indicators of citations as well as measures of societal impact. This chapter provides an overview of Twitter activity as the basis for scholarly metrics from a critical point of view and equally describes the potential and limitations of scholarly Twitter metrics. By reviewing the literature on Twitter in scholarly communication and analyzing 24 million tweets linking to scholarly documents, it aims to provide a basic understanding of what tweets can and cannot measure in the context of research evaluation. Going beyond the limited explanatory power of low correlations between tweets and citations, this chapter considers what types of scholarly documents are popular on Twitter, and how, when and by whom they are diffused in order to understand what tweets to scholarly documents measure. Although this chapter is not able to solve the problems associated with the creation of meaningful metrics from social media, it highlights particular issues and aims to provide the basis for advanced scholarly Twitter metrics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑