arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1805.02475cs.CV

Comparative evaluation of instrument segmentation and tracking methods in minimally invasive surgery

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT)(国家肿瘤疾病中心(NCT));Intuitive Surgical(直觉外科公司);Université Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);CHU Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学医院);Grenoble INP(格勒诺布尔综合理工学院);TIMC-IMAG(TIMC-IMAG实验室);Centre for Medical Image Computing(医学影像计算中心);University College London(伦敦大学学院);Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg(海德堡大学普通、内脏和移植外科系);ARTORG Center, University of Bern(伯尔尼大学ARTORG中心);Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Johns Hopkins University(约翰霍普金斯大学计算机辅助医疗程序);Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)(卡尔斯鲁厄理工学院(KIT)人机工程与机器人研究所)
Sebastian Bodenstedt, Max Allan, Anthony Agustinos, Xiaofei Du, Luis Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Hannes Kenngott, Thomas Kurmann, Beat Müller-Stich, Sebastien Oursel… 展开作者

Sebastian Bodenstedt, Max Allan, Anthony Agustinos, Xiaofei Du, Luis Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Hannes Kenngott, Thomas Kurmann, Beat Müller-Stich, Sebastien Ourselin, Daniil Pakhomov, Raphael Sznitman, Marvin Teichmann, Martin Thoma, Tom Vercauteren, Sandrine Voros, Martin Wagner, Pamela Wochner, Lena Maier-Hein, Danail Stoyanov, Stefanie Speidel

英文摘要:

Intraoperative segmentation and tracking of minimally invasive instruments is a prerequisite for computer- and robotic-assisted surgery. Since additional hardware like tracking systems or the robot encoders are cumbersome and lack accuracy, surgical vision is evolving as promising techniques to segment and track the instruments using only the endoscopic images. However, what is missing so far are common image data sets for consistent evaluation and benchmarking of algorithms against each other. The paper presents a comparative validation study of different vision-based methods for instrument segmentation and tracking in the context of robotic as well as conventional laparoscopic surgery. The contribution of the paper is twofold: we introduce a comprehensive validation data set that was provided to the study participants and present the results of the comparative validation study. Based on the results of the validation study, we arrive at the conclusion that modern deep learning approaches outperform other methods in instrument segmentation tasks, but the results are still not perfect. Furthermore, we show that merging results from different methods actually significantly increases accuracy in comparison to the best stand-alone method. On the other hand, the results of the instrument tracking task show that this is still an open challenge, especially during challenging scenarios in conventional laparoscopic surgery.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑