认知与现实
Cognition and Reality
摘要：
我们讨论了人类认知的两个阶段，即理解（A）和判断（B），前者是通过神经元群的募集产生连贯的感知，后者是通过比较在不同时间获得的、用适当的语言编码并由记忆检索的两种理解。(B)这需要自我意识，因为表达判断的主体必须意识到这两种理解是提交给他/她自己的审查，并且他/她的任务是提取相互关系。由于（B）持续约3秒，因此必须在该时间内确定比较中的片段的语义值。这意味着对存储器内容的快速搜索。事实上，通过对人类受试者的简单单词序列的研究，我们发现了一个有限的时间窗口的证据，对应于一个语言项目的记忆提取，以便将其与文本流中的下一个匹配（无论是文学，音乐还是比喻）。虽然恐惧是全球解释为贝叶斯推理，判断结果从逆贝叶斯推理。因此，出现了两种诠释学（分别称为循环和盘绕）。第一个在预先分配的特征空间中起作用。第二个是发现新的特征，从而揭示以前未知的方面，从而代表通往现实的道路。
英文摘要：
We discuss the two moments of human cognition, namely, apprehension (A), whereby a coherent perception emerges from the recruitment of neuronal groups, and judgment(B),that entails the comparison of two apprehensions acquired at different times, coded in a suitable language and retrieved by memory. (B) entails self-consciousness, in so far as the agent who expresses the judgment must be aware that the two apprehensions are submitted to his/her own scrutiny and that it is his/her task to extract a mutual relation. Since (B) lasts around 3 seconds, the semantic value of the pieces under comparison must be decided within that time. This implies a fast search of the memory contents. As a fact, exploring human subjects with sequences of simple words, we find evidence of a limited time window , corresponding to the memory retrieval of a linguistic item in order to match it with the next one in a text flow (be it literary, or musical,or figurative). While apprehension is globally explained as a Bayes inference, judgment tresults from an inverse Bayes inference. As a consequence, two hermeneutics emerge (called respectively circle and coil). The first one acts in a pre-assigned space of features. The second one provides the discovery of novel features, thus unveiling previously unknown aspects and hence representing the road to reality.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
